|
| quote: | Originally posted by Lemonad
Reason why i posted that link was to counter that comment about Iranian minds. I bet the 2 previous attempts that worked on the project were full blooded Americans and still failed. This guy having been born in Iran still set him apart from the others cause he was "Iranian". I bet all the people that worked on the project were taught in America but still didn't reach his caliber. |
I never said that Iranians were stupid. I simply said that the country doesn't have the minds for this. I just read that the country loses about 150,000 of its collegiate level population every year. How the hell can Iran accomplish anything significant (and beneficial) when its brightest people are leaving at that pace? I went to a top tier US university with a substantial international student body, so I understand the intellectual capacity of people from around the world. In addition, I work at an international consulting firm with very bright people from just about every country. However, certain countries (apparently Iran being the tops of this list) have a difficult time retaining their talent because of the political environment.
In any event, this scientist was taught in america as well! Let's just assume you have a point (which i'm not conceding), what does that prove? One person born in Iran, who has lived in the US for the past 30 years and was educated in the US, means that Iran has more intellectual resources than the US or that it's population is generally smarter than americans? That's simply stupid because this man is likely more of an outlier, and your assertion is simply not verifiable.
A quick wikipedia search (because i'm not too interested in doing real research on this issue) shows that the US has about 15 million students enrolled at college at any given time. Furthermore, the US has the top universities in the world (recognized by every reputable person - i.e., harvard, princeton, stanford, columbia, MIT) On the other hand, Iran has a population of about 60 million people, and about 1 million people in university. I don't doubt those 1 million students are bright, however, when matched by the sheer number of students produced in the US, they are simply outmatched. Additionally, in certain cases, US students benefit from having some of the brightest research minds from around the world teaching them (at the top schools). As a result, the chances that the US will produce more brilliant students (on a whole number scale) is much greater than the chances for Iran.
As the saying goes, the proof is in the pudding. Take a look at how many nobel prize winners in economics, physics, and medicine come from the US. Then take a look at how many come from Iran. Also, you should try and create a list of recent significant contributions to technology, medicine, etc.... made by Iranians. I'm sure that list is much shorter than a similar list of american contributions. Admittedly, some of this may be a result of the stifling political environment in Iran, however, that doesn't diminish my point because the political environment is a factor in all of this.
As for Pierre Omidyar, the french born iranian, he moved to the US at the age of six, and is entirely a product of american education. Your examples suck because they don't prove anything. These men are americans, who were born somewhere else (like tens of millions of other americans). How do they contribute to Iranian resources?
Last edited by jerZ07002 on Feb-14-2009 at 21:29
|