 |
|
|
|
 |
Sean Walsh
JAGERMAESTRO
Registered: Sep 2001
Location: Downtown Vancouver
|
|
|
It's likely lazy producers that are just dragging in loops of whatever BPM from Vengeance or whatever other sample CD they torrented, and then using them as-is in their mixdown.
___________________
"When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading."
|
|
Mar-03-2009 04:56
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
kitphillips
is actually a guy.
Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Blake_Jarrell
I read Tarekith's comparison but hes only mixing down 3 audio loops, like you say in your later post, it doesnt take into account:
Fixed pan laws
Fixed fader curves
Clipping behaviour (maybe clips are handled better by logic?)
Dither (or lack thereof) (included as of version 6)
lack of crossfades in arrangement view (fixed in version 8)
Inferior inbuilt effects
and most importantly how each program handles the processing of effects, even when using identical plug ins.
so its not really showing the whole story, even though it is very interesting.
I was explaining that Ableton is optimized for Live situations, thus has features that are more efficient and could be the reason why the mixdown may suffer. whats so hard to understand about that? |
Honestly though, all that stuff won't make an actual difference to the mix in the end. The fader curves and pan laws just change the way you work not the way it sounds in the end. You can still get the same result out of ableton as you would in logic. Except the possibly inferior effects, which I don't use anyway, but I admit that I'm not a huge fan of the in built effects.
The way it handles the processing of effects even when using identical plugins is the same as logic/cubase/PT/Reaper/Sonar/FL/anything. There IS NO DIFFERENCE. That's what I was saying was silly about your post. Theres no difference in the summing engine, and no difference in the way it "handles effects". Tarekith's test proves that almost beyond doubt...
I'm happy to hear if you have any other ideas about what might be causing differences in the mixdown, but just saying "Its optimised for live use and is therefore inferior in terms of sound quality" is really silly IMO.
Again, I put it down to user error, rather than any actual difference in the audio engine.
___________________
New Mix: March 2010 Promo
Soundcloud|Facebook
|
|
Mar-03-2009 06:44
|
|
|
 |
 |
Knowland
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2008
Location: In the Know
|
|
|
Timestretch with Elastique is a rig at best. It will make everything sound different. As to why this is affecting Ableton producers I could only guess it's because they think it solves all their problems of not having correctly pitched samples? If it's used it's going to inflect Elastique's tonal character. So your best bet is to Mask the sound with reverb or some other technique.
|
|
Mar-03-2009 08:43
|
|
|
 |
 |
kitphillips
is actually a guy.
Registered: May 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
You have to use clip envelopes. So go to the clip and then click on "e" and draw in the envelope. Look it up in the manual if confused about what I mean.
Theres no way to actually "record" automation by hand in the session view that I know of, it needs to be drawn unfortunately (which is a major gripe of ableton users)
___________________
New Mix: March 2010 Promo
Soundcloud|Facebook
|
|
Mar-04-2009 15:20
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:51.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|