|
| quote: | Originally posted by Prometheus Xex
Hmmm... so, for example, let's say a person has a small image that shows what tune is currently playing... and it's deleted by an admin citing "spam". Then a couple of weeks later it's added again, and the same thing happens and it's deleted again for the same "spam" reason.
Now let's say there's another, who also has a similar "currently playing" banner in his/her sig. And that person posts far more frequently than the above person, yet their sig remains in tact all throughout the time the other is chopped and edited at an admins discretion.
In these two examples both are so called "spamming", but one is punished and the other is not. Does this mean that "rules are rules" and "spam is spam" applies to only certain singled out individuals and not others?
Also, when a question about an explanation is sent to one of the admins, it's NEVER answered.
This kind of reminds me of ...
"All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others". Animal Farm - circa 1945
Thankyou and have a nice day, 
Signed,
Just Curious |
i dont know about that. i dont deal with that and never came across that.
all i know is this boagod guy creates an account and his very first post was spam so he is here to only spam, therefore, banned.
___________________
|
