|

Foreword: I'm no ludite - I've been playing with computers since I was 14, back in DOS 4.0/Windows 2.0 days and "Aware of all your Internet traditions". I am fully self-taught and got my first IT job when I was 19 - so I embrace technology wherever it is relevant. What I'm about to say will certainly sound contradictory, but bear with it.
I embrace Ableton and have nothing short of disdain for Cubase (flame away). I hate samples, yet use sample-based Maschine. I appreciate having MIDI, sometimes "painting" difficult progressions by mouse, instead of playing them out. I couldn't tell B or E or F or G by hearing it and most certaly would have a hard time pointing it out on my keyboard.
...but I do have to agree with Wiley that this Catanya is certainly cringe-worthy. It's not that it's easy to make - IT MAKES EDM SEEM... PRIMITIVELY DISPOSABLY STUPIDLY RETARDEDLY POINTLESS. What's the point in coming up with your own ideas, when you can have someone else do the work for you. Where's the reward? It's like having a program that does all the writing for you, you just pick from a menu. It's pretty weak, IMO. I may not know shit about theory and having MIDI + transpose made my life easier but I still have to come up with ideas to feed to MIDI. This takes it steps beyond and I find it "unsportsmanlike".
Many hits have been made using loops, samples, even presets. It's a matter of personal pride. Chef equivalent - do you use canned vegetables in your dishes or do you cook your own? Both may produce a delicious dish - it's all a matter of how it was prepared and served. Most likely dish prepared with organic fresh vegetables will taste much better than generic canned ones, provided same chef used same steps and ingredients. Or one may not notice entirely.
What it comes down to is HOW DOES CHEF FEEL about it? Is there more pride in cooking from scratch or more pride in getting the dish done quickly?
I've been working on re-making a classic trance track and so far, have invested over 100 HOURS in first 64 bars or so. That's about 100 hours for about... a minute worth of track re-made. I have a GREAT DEAL OF PRIDE in what I accomplished because:
1. I am training my ear to distinguish various elements in a track and arrangement
2. I'm learning my tools intimately
3. I'm advancing my skills by careful examination of mastery involved
4. I learn to program my own drum loops, finding other interesting tricks in between
5. I can say that even though I copied someone else's work - there's more in that track of ME than of the original producer, thereby making the track more special TO ME.
I get a sense of satisfaction from reverse engineering a process, hacking - if you will. Someone else may get a kick out of finishing a product and getting it released. As long as it resonates with the masses - who cares. Both schools of thought are purely philosophical, provided both result in a quality product.
On the opposite side of that spectrum is what you will hear on today's radio. Please listen to radio for a day and note how many pop tracks today use Antares autotune? I'd guess over 60% - and nearly ALL OF THEM sound like SHIT. At some point, some tosser producer decided that having a no-tallent singer's voice corrected would be cool because technology was there (thanks Cher, you cracky ol' back of AIDS). You then have "I'm so two thousand and eight, you're so two thousand and late" - being drilled into your ears by Blackshit Piss every 15 minutes (or "I've got a feeling").
All we need now is Antares + Catanya + sample libraries and you're ready to rock the dance floors.
We had a similar debate here few weeks ago - about buying patch banks vs programming your own (hello Alonzo!) and I expressed same ludite view - programming your own sounds is more rewarding in a LONG RUN.
Do I use presets? yup. Samples? well, sort off - if you count sampled instruments in Maschine. I don't usually use loops, unless I de-construct it and make it myself.
Bottom line is - music is art and as long as it is executed in a way that evokes an emotion, it "passed the smell test". However, I am concerned that having so many crutches breeds a generation of "technicians" and "arrangers" not trully worthy of being called "producer" - as the only thing they produce is gluing the pieces together.
Just because you assembled an IKEA bookshelf, it doesn't make you a furniture maker. Now, if you take the same shelf, re-finish it, re-paint it, change it into something else that resembles nothing that you originally purchased - YOU'RE A DESIGNER, maybe an artisan, but still - NOT A FURNITURE MAKER. You may make something mind-blowingly amazing, but you're still not a furniture maker.
I guess that's the crux of the discussion... and full of contradiction, I know. But I'll leave it at that.
/rant
///tons of anologies
___________________
Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch'intrate
Last edited by aNYthing on Feb-03-2010 at 22:43
|