|
I app
| quote: | Originally posted by Chimney
Because of this (I think):
Use full length articles from peer reviewed journals
Abstracts are not allowed
Paper submitted but not accepted are not allowed
Limit references to key citations (20-40)
Place reference citations properly
- Previous reports have shown an incidence of 50%12,24,29
"Abstracts now allowed". |
Well, the annals of a scientific congress tend to be peer-reviewed - whether or not they're a journal is pretty much a matter of semantics, I believe, but I've never heard of a single conference/congress in which the papers submitted were not screened in a way or another. From what I understand, you can't use just the abstract (for obvious reasons) and/or stuff published in "unmoderated" media, such as blogs, magazines and the like. The rest is fair game.
Wait, where is this questionnaire from? That's all the info they provided you? 
| quote: | Originally posted by Meat187
How he fuck did this thread go from Clockwork Orange over Star Wars to proper citation in scientific articles? |
Such are the dynamics of an internet forum 
Apparently I tend to be the cause of such derailments whenever I post. I blame my ADHD and my utter inability to focus on any given subject for more than hey, look, trolley carts! 
___________________
Indiana Clones Upcoming Sets
[ I May Upload Something Someday ]
|