|
P.O.S. - Remember was a belter. Amnesiac got a lot of airplay at the time, but I always thought it was quite forgettable by comparison.
Progressive house versus progressive trance? I recall very long threads I was involved in that attempted to settle the question, especially when "progressive" came into parlance. Good lord, was that a decade ago? J has given the most appropriate examples so far.
Any meaningful distinction between progressive house and progressive trance evaporated by 2003, when the two currents converged under a single "progressive" banner. The stragglers were mostly regrouped as branches of psytrance (think JOOF) or trance (think the more progressive examples of MIKE through the middle of the decade). Progressive trance as a stand-alone unit ceased to exist, with rare exceptions, and progressive became more plodding, directionless, and boring, before minimal and electro house upended the landscape around 2006-07.
That's the last time I really paid attention to this debate, and since then it seems like "progressive" has been engaged in a long and tortured turf war with terms like house and electro as sounds have steadily shifted away from the traditional "progressive aesthetic". I seem to recall a year or two in there where they tried to rebrand as "tech house", but usually this was just a euphemism for progressive house that was trying to be minimal.
Bedrock has held on in spirit with stuff from Guy J and Henry Saiz, which still sounds "progressive" although markedly different from the genre of a decade ago. Apart from that I would say progressive doesn't really exist anymore, and better to just say house these days. Plus ça change...
(PS: check out Blondes)
|