|
if writing is a part of the job, then sure. People with asperger tend to have trouble communicating their ideas. There is an abnormally high number of people with aspergers in high tech industry. They were not hired for the linguistic prowess. To attribute a skill that has little pertinence to the job is illogical. Not completely irrelevant but it shouldn't be the overriding factor when it is not what you are being paid to do. I do think the better you communicate, the better off you are. So one should strive to excel at it as it will give you an edge in any field when added to your other set of skills.
And given a job where writing does count and 2 candidates where one individual is much better at writing but the other is just a better team player, i would pick the individual with the better attitude. When the quality of your writing is not the actual output of your work, i think most would also pick the individual that is easier to get along with. As System J said, there is a base level. When grammar mistakes affect people's lives such as law, sure. But for the most part, adequate is good enough. Being better is also good but i think there are other attributes that might be more important depending on the job.
___________________
"This is why Superman works alone." GC
old stuff from days gone by (2001-2004)
Mad For Brad's gay little contest
Last edited by Looney4Clooney on Aug-14-2012 at 21:51
|