|
Not to mention that this distinction between "low art" (movies) which is primarily entertaining and "high art" (films) that should make you think is fucking useless these days. And I'm not talking about Lady Gaga's approach to this. Some films, like Verhoeven's, use straight up B-movie aesthetics yet if you "turn your brain off" you're probably going to miss a lot of what's going on there. On the other hand, some arthouse films can look sophisticated if they use enough long shots and their narration is "emptied", but there actually may be nothing worth examining under this surface.
Or perhaps the correct argument should be that some art/avant-garde films can also be simply entertaining.
___________________
"All revolutions are the sheerest fantasies until they happen; then they become historical inevitabilities."
Last edited by GoSpeedGo! on Sep-24-2012 at 19:48
|