 |
|
|
|
 |
ManWithNoName
Suspended User
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Middlesbrough, England
|
|
|
Mar-05-2003 14:07
|
|
|
 |
 |
djcresto
Tranceaddict Trainer

Registered: May 2001
Location: Dendermonde
|
|
|
Mar-05-2003 14:07
|
|
|
 |
 |
ManWithNoName
Suspended User
Registered: Nov 2002
Location: Middlesbrough, England
|
|
|
Mar-05-2003 14:14
|
|
|
 |
 |
djcresto
Tranceaddict Trainer

Registered: May 2001
Location: Dendermonde
|
|
|
Mar-05-2003 14:16
|
|
|
 |
 |
tommie
tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2001
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by barryfigiel
Tommie- tell me you never downloaded any music file of any kind...
Idiot!
If it weren't for mp3s I wouldn't own half as many of the vinyls from lightning records (and their sub-labels)as I do. I think this great, great loss is down to bad management rather than mp3. Just because mp3s exist doesn't mean all these downloads would translate directly into sales. In my case, I download a lot of music. And I buy all the best stuff on vinyl. So if anything it means I spend more cash on vinyl... not less!
lateRZ,
barryfigiel |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nige|
That was a really really dumb comment, labels do not go down cause of mp3's being spread, as has been said in many posts its bad management that fucked up lightning not the mp3 scene.
Fucking fool |
Wake up and smell the reality. It's obvious that both of you guys is completely without insight in the label business. Sure, some parts might have been bad management, but the majority of the problems regarding Lightning was financial income.
Like someone pointed out earlier, Airwaves album was ripped and "released" on the net before it was even finished. And sure, it's a nice utopia that you actually belive that people will buy cd's. But trust me, they don't.
The largest income for labels used to be compilations, get one of your signed artists onto a well known compilation and that month economy is take care of. Today, no one buys compilations, why? Well, we buy vinyls or download gems of the net.
The situation today is more or less "I Like this artists therefor i will support him by buying his/hers album/vinly", and yes, that works, but it's a extremely small amount of money involved in those releases (exempt if you name is Tijs Verwest and produces under the guise 'Dj Tiesto'). Before mp3 it was "Oh, i need some new tunes, i better buy this new compilation from -insert your favorite label-".
So, is the solution to start buying compilations, probably not since this has been going on for to long time now. The future of trance? Well, worst case scenario is that more and more labels disappears and less quality is releases, why? Simple, no one will be able to live from musical income, at least not within our scene.
So whats left if multi-sized-labels with artists such as Britney Spears and Backstreet boys.
horray. 
|
|
Mar-05-2003 16:19
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:32.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|