 |
|
|
|
 |
Lira
Ancient BassAddict

Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Brasilia, Brazil
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
Because if it's biologically TRUE that someone 18 or younger doesn't have all of their brain developed, then yes it does mean that they aren't as "mature" as someone older than them. |
And how does that translate into observable behaviour? Here, let me make a quick analogy:
Let's say a 16 year old can't reason as well as an 18 year old because her brain isn't fully developed. Now, instead of relationships and whatnot, let's talk about mathematics, for clarity sake. Is is justified to say that the 18 year old is necessarily a better mathematician than the 16 year old? Now, back to the whole maturity thing, can you say that the 18 year old is necessarily going to display a more mature behaviour (whatever that is) than the 16 year old? Just as the 16 year old may be more passionate and diligent student of maths, whereas the 18 year old is just a slacker (thus turning the odds against the 18 year old), the 16 year old in question may be more concerned about others, while the 18 year old could just have fully developed brain and no interest on this issue. Is it correct in any way to say that the 18 year old is more mature than the 16 year old simply because of biological differences? Unless you're talking strictly about biology, age is no sufficient condition here.
By the way, how is that difference relevant among the legal girls we're talking about? They're pretty much all over 18 anyway 
___________________
Indiana Clones Upcoming Sets
[ I May Upload Something Someday ]
|
|
Aug-12-2009 03:43
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 21:34.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|