|
| quote: | Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
Its not though. I would make this same argument either way. Eddie also agrees with me, and he did not know my uncle, I didn't know my uncle either, it was 10 years before I was even born.
You can not argue that violent suicide is not selfish. It the act itself is inherently selfish. You are killing yourself. Selfishness is "devoted to or caring only for oneself; concerned primarily with one's own interests, benefits, welfare, etc., regardless of others." Suicide is of interest only to the person committing it and furthermore it is regardless of other peoples concerns in almost all cases. If the person is not horribly ill than most people will not consider suicide a viable, or even sane alternative. Especially for people like Jay or my uncle whos only driving motivation to actually commit the act was the failure of a romantic relationship.
This is a very cut and dry argument and I think that you people are hung up on the death of DA or maybe others and you find it hard to blame the victim. Well sadly with suicide you can almost never not blame the victim, as they made the conscious choice to end their own lives, irregardless of the concerns of those around them and for their own benefit, which is the definition of selfishness!
*edit*
WTF it censored irregardless... HOW IS THAT A BAD WORD IN ANYWAY!? IT DOESNT EVEN CONTAIN A BAD WORD!!! |
Your use of the word, ************, is essentially is a double negative meaning that what ever the non-word, ************, pertains to should actually be fully regarded. The word you are looking for is, regardless. Regardless of your usage of a non-word, I still agree with what you're saying. Many people find the usage of the non-word annoying, hence the censorship.
| quote: | | Originally posted by Lira It's become painfully obvious that this discussion is not about suicide, but about your deceased uncle, and that it's comfortable for you to label him as a selfish bastard so you can keep some healthy distance. |
I don't think he's making the distinctions he's making so he can maintain a healthy distance. I think he's making the distinctions he's making because he has a distance, which healthy or not (I think it is but some may disagree), allows for perspective on the issue.
EDIT: To think I've been striving to avoid redundancy, regardless.
___________________

Now with extra singles!
my old stuff, not quite up to snuff - but I still dig it - UPDATED 9/23/2012
Last edited by EddieZilker on Apr-07-2010 at 21:51
|