|
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
Don't get Butthurt (or homophobic) just becuase you're too dumb to understand what's going in other parts of the world.
NATO has forces there, all under NATO control, NOT US control or command, dipshit. The USAF is not flying missions there for the USA, nor do they have any central command over NATO assets. As I said several pages ago, and as repeated on this page, the USA is a member of NATO and has obligations to perform as part of a NATO controlled military force.
It's not even a discussion point that US planes or pilots are being used, as they are under full NATO control. If you're too thick to understand this, please just keep jacking off to your easy-wipe pictures of Ronald Reagan and leave this thread alone. |
Look at you trying to change the argument. You aren't fooling anybody. This isn't about who's calling the shots. And nobody is arguing who has control of the missions.... it is about this:
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
You can suppose whatever you want about the future but the USA as of right now has zero assets active in Libya. |
Now, I'll ask you one more time... YES or NO... per your quote, does the USA have zero assets active in Libya? Here's a hint below, again repeated.
| quote: | | While officials may claim American is taking a back seat in the campaign, U.S. jets have attacked Libyan targets three times in the last 10 days. Add in aerial refueling, reconnaissance and electronic jamming missions and the U.S. is flying 35 percent of all the NATO missions. |
Yes or no: Are U.S. jets U.S. assets?
Yes or no: Are U.S. refueling planes U.S. assets?
Yes or no: Are U.S. pilots U.S. assets?
Yes or no: Are U.S. munitions being dropped U.S. assets?
|