|
| quote: | Originally posted by dJohn
To me, the tech trance argument falls along the line of people debating progressive vs progressive trance. Because it's music, and because it involves our own abberations and preconceived perceptions, dry categorizations are impossible to acheive, let alone the claiming of new genres. Songs these days are taking advantage of intertwining different STYLES rather than trying to do a shitty hybrid style mashup(not talking about bootlegs) One song that comes to mind is Sander van Doorn - Loaded. It has somewhat constant proportions of techno and progressive trance and house intertwined, but the reason why the track doesn't go overboard is because each element is minimal, yet stand outs in it's own way. Repeated synths, hardbassline, soft pads...you get the idea.
For me, tech trance exists, and it's the only type of trance other than progressive(whatever that means) that I 'believe in'. |
Yes YeS YES I'm with you there... when will people stop arguing about it and just enjoy their music? It's not a problem to be solved, and terms are quite relative. I bet, say, Japanese have all sorts of words for these types of music too :P
Otherwise, it's just...
REDUNDANT!
___________________
Hi, my name's Torley. I'm here at TA to learn, share, and have fun! 
get hooked, click here to listen to "The_Autistic_World_of_Torley.mp3" | dialup version
more @ torley's techno music and anti-techno music blog
|