|
| quote: | Originally posted by chesco
wether it was deliberate or not, he still impeded the keeper which is a foul. Why can't you english understand the rules. |
Well to be honest, the keeper didnt have any touch on the ball, not from the original shot. So therefore he isn't impeded. I would agree with the decision if the keeper had actually touched the ball.
I understand the rules clearly, i just didnt agree on that one.
___________________
frase.org.uk - music & stuff
myspace
|