 |
|
|
|
 |
Ben Brown
Polar Bear's Toenails

Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by nrjizer
Whats dumb about laptops is that they're useless. Digital vinyl? Honestly, why not just use REAL records in that case? Saves you $1500 for a laptop/software. Laptops are also fragile, hard drives can die, the software can crash, etc.
If you're going to go digital, go CD, you can do much much more with it. If your CDs are lost, stolen, etc, just re-burn them. If someone gives you a fresh promo on CDR you can play it as soon as you want. |
good points about the fragility of laptops, but their greater use comes from sampling, on-the-fly editing and visual interfaces that allow the user to concentrate on creating more complicated music within sets. i disagree that laptops are useless. why not take your digital studio (in the form of your 'laptop') with you? you could even create a track on the way to a gig and play it right off the comp that same night...just some thoughts.
also, why burn a cdr when that someone could just send you the mp3 via the web?
|
|
Aug-10-2004 05:37
|
|
|
 |
 |
beats and beeps
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by nrjizer
Whats dumb about laptops is that they're useless. Digital vinyl? Honestly, why not just use REAL records in that case? Saves you $1500 for a laptop/software. Laptops are also fragile, hard drives can die, the software can crash, etc.
If you're going to go digital, go CD, you can do much much more with it. If your CDs are lost, stolen, etc, just re-burn them. If someone gives you a fresh promo on CDR you can play it as soon as you want. |
Yes laptops are expensive...but vinyl is waaayyyy more expensive in the long run, also you can do SO much more with a laptop. Djs are getting bored, so they want to be more creative. Laptops let them do this. Laptops can die, sofware can crash, and laptops are somewhat fragile...this is true, but vinyl isnt ALWAYS a walk in the park either...
|
|
Aug-10-2004 05:53
|
|
|
 |
 |
varun
Sunbaked
Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Bangkok
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by TwoPlow
Oh shit, the big boys are doing it, we better all hunker down and follow suit.
The future is not CD over vinyl or sticking to vinyl alone, you have to combine all the available mediums. And who the fuck cares what you're spinning on, as long as you throw down a great set. |
I agree completely. Although I must admit I have also been gradually sliding in favor of CD's...far more portable and also in conjunction with the fact that record labels are going digital.
Vinyls are definitely NOT lame though
___________________
Spacy dreamer
|
|
Aug-10-2004 07:52
|
|
|
 |
 |
noikeee
dubstep convert

Registered: Apr 2002
Location: lost and wandering looking for directions.
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by nrjizer
You know, I find it odd that everyone still goes on and on about the convenience of carrying a CD wallet instead of a box of records, while completely missing the REAL advantavges of the CD/digital format.
Just look at what James Zabiela does - there's simply so much more creative potential with CD's than there is with vinyl. This is definately its biggest advantage. Why don't people realize this?
The other big advantage is that new, unreleased tracks are dirt cheap to produce and put in the DJ's hands. Five years ago, some kid in his bedroom with the next big track would have to first promote himself to a swarm of record labels, get signed, and wait for the first promo records to be pressed. Today, he can burn a million copies himself and send them off to anyone and everyone. If he's a DJ, he can finish his track that afternoon and be spinning it that evening.
Don't get me wrong, vinyl is great. The sound is still better, technics are still rugged and dependable. But refusing to accept CD's simply for nostalgia's sake is ignorant. Both have their advantages and theres zero reason why both records and CD's can't coexist in our record bins. |
completely agreed - except for the "sound is still better" of vinyl, that is highly subjective but i still like them
i also think one day mixing on software will become acceptable. dj'ing these days in genres like uplifting trance where most dj's just do the transitions and barely no tricks is just focused on beatmatching and eq'ing, apart from track selection. why should dj's be 100% dependent on beatmatching by ear when there's computers that can help a bit? it's just the tradition, the "the dj has to know how to beatmatch" basical skill. on uplifting trance this becomes overrated cause that's a huge part of what the dj does. on more versatile genres like techno i think there's is a door for computer-aided beatmatching cause it allows the dj's to be creative without having to worry about it.
___________________
sempre contra a corrente do jogo
|
|
Aug-10-2004 10:50
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:32.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|