|
| quote: | Originally posted by charmscars
some men are targetted unfairly and some women suffer greatly. yes some divorced men care deeply about there children, but there are those that do not. I work in insurance, and i can tell you about a guy who has company benefits and he has been ordered to put his kids on his policy. so what he does to his wife, is she, will have the dental payment assigned to the dentist to cover her kids dental work and he will go into his benefits and change the payment to go to him (this is legal btw) so the mom gets stuck paying out of pocket whrn his insurance company has covered it and he makes a profit off of the backs of his kids, so the mom can't afford to have her kids dental work done, she is no longer going to take them for annual dental checkups. so in this case, it is not bullshit, ppl can actually be this selfish. |
Tara, anybody can pull a scam, in divorce or in any other walk of life. Yes, guys like this are fucked, but it's not the present-day divorce system that enables them to pull the scam, it's the insurance and medical system. This isn't evidence of a system biased toward men, just evidence that there are a lot of assholes out there, which I'll concede to you in a heartbeat.
And I'll point out also that many hardworking women who work AND take care of their kids because the dad is unfit end up getting screwed by the system.
The problem is that the system favours the lazy and stupid. The court's mandate for divorce is to allow both parties to "live in the same conditions as they were when they were married." This is a product of Socialist thinking and it doesn't take an expert to see the problem with it. The obvious reason for a divorce is - you guessed it - the marital conditions sucked!
So when a woman works, she's entitled to child support but not a lot of alimony, which is how it should be. It only looks sad and ridiculous in the face of the ones who don't work, but can - the lazy asses that couldn't or didn't hold up an honest job for more than 3 hours while they were married. The courts say to the man, well, you accepted this way of life during your marriage so you have to keep it this way. So she sits on her ass and gets a free salary.
The courts don't even stop to consider the remote possibility that they got divorced because she was lazy and didn't take proper care of the kids. Or the even more remote possibility that she only married him for money in the first place (let's not kid ourselves ladies, you yourselves may be above this type of thing but it sure as hell happens out there in the real world).
The way the system is structured essentially encourages women to be as lazy as possible during marriage because that nets the biggest payout in divorce. The less a woman worked while they were married, the more she's going to get in alimony payments. THAT'S what's so fucked up about the system. And don't try to tell me that if you reversed the roles, and the woman worked like a dog throughout the marriage and the man sat on the couch all day, that the woman would have to make the same kind of alimony payments to the man after getting a divorce. Because that just isn't true. It's happened, and the proportion of alimony isn't even close.
Perhaps it's not quite correct to say that the system favours women. It doesn't favour all women. When you have a hardworking woman and a hardworking man, it can make either or both of their lives very difficult, and difficult is what you'd expect from trying to work and take care of a kid at the same time. Who has the most difficult time generally depends on who has custody - making that choice depends on a delicate balance of sharing the responsibility and looking realistically at the fitness of each parent. Often, the good-hearted women get screwed on this front because the dad is an unfit dad - but can you really lay ALL the blame on him when it was her choice to marry him and have kids in the first place? You may say that she didn't "know" he would be such a lousy parent, but I've seen this situation up close and these guys send out red flags like crazy. I mean they are absolute jerks - before, after, and during marrige. Women and men both ignore these red flags and get married anyway because they're in "love".
But I digress. The point is that although the system doesn't necessarily favour women in general, who it does favour is LAZY and MANIPULATIVE women, which is exactly who it should be punishing instead.
Does that make it any clearer? If you think I'm making grandiose generalizations then I'd be happy to collect some case studies for you.
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|