|
Hi, Here i am, back on track Had a busy week and thus no time for replying. First let me tell you that I appreciate your, you could almost say, enthusiasm in that discussion. I can totally relate to you , since i have also talked people to death in the past 2 years as i realized that hardly no1 knows the "truth" or at least the "other side". In those 2 years i havent only leanred a lot about the conflict itself, its history, the current situation and its psychological background, I also analyzed the critic's attitudes and motives, their structure of argumentation and their intention. Its very funny to find out that in fact there are only a few types of israel-critics that can be easily studied. In many cases, after hearing one two sentences, I know exactely who im dealing with, what ansers to bring and what his reaction will look like. I guess that u have experienced the same in yout "fight for justice" 
Who critisized Israel and how? Its odd enough that this conflict is so omipresent in the media (as u already stated this can be explained by Israel's free press, but its not only that) but why do so many people really care and take sides?
Well in my opnion the flollowing people will "care" and raise their voice against Israel: Extre-right wing ppl (antisemites), Extreme-left wing people(in my opnion as bad, if not worse due to their hyprocraty) who pretend to fight for the "weak and oppressed" against "injustice and imperialism", In many cases the latter type of critic pretends to be an Anti-zionist only, but only hides behind this much more comfortable word in order to express anti-judaitisc views (yes, some "lefties" are as antisemitic as neo nazis, look at communist russia for example). Then there are the people who dont think too much on their own and just rely on the media's views. They see kids fighting tanks and immediately side with the "underdog". Another stereotype is the European who, out of his complex towards Jews(based on the tragic history), will be on the Jewísh side (thinking that he owes them something). But exately this kind of person could also seek for a way out of this complex by compensating his bad conscience with an attitude of "look what those jews are doing. they arent angles themselves. The arabs are the Nazi's second victims..". Last but not least there are the religous protestant fundamentalist wholl side with the jews since he belives in the "god given land" anf of course the fool who wants to impress a hot chick by discussin politics 
About your way to discuss this tricky problem...I think your argumentation is based on the justification of the Israeli side only, without any proposal or sythesis as for the solution of the conflict. Because if want to make peace, you'll need the other side as well. By calling them BAD (in your comparing kind of context as well) you wont find any way out of the current dilemma. However, somtimes your kind of argumentation is necessary, especially in the case of the stereotypes mentioned above. They dont want a solution either, they just wanna judge, not think, just flame and close their eyes to any alternative. I agree to all of your facts, they are nothing new to me, and i use them alot too but then again...they wont help in certain situations.
The settlements. As i said, u look at it in a too rational way. Let's admit that the middle east conflict is no chess game, logics have disappeared a long time ago. This war is enormously emotionalised (on both sides). There are still discussions about the interpretation of the Geneva Cpnvention going on, so its not SO clear. One argument is for example that the fact that the settlement was planned organized supported and carried out by the governments means that you COULD see it as a "deportation" as well (since the convention doesnt say a word about whehter the settling has to be voluntary or not). But then again, this whole debate is irrelevant. Let's take the settlements in the Gaza strip for example. Imagine living in the Gaza strip, the most populated place on earth, no job, swimming in shit and urine, on a hot day...and then u see those beautiful white houses, surrounded by tanks, where little children jump into swimming pools.(Note: I dont blame Israel for this miserable life conditions, well not totally) Will you care about the Geneva Convention? Or the fact that Oslo DOES implement the possbility of the settlements expansion? Or will ya get mad at some point? The average Palestinian suffers, BUT! then again i say that violence has got NOTHING to do with their frustration. THAT is for me a lame excuse and cheap arab propaganda. The ppl ARE frustrated, the terror acts, however, are precisely planned "military strikes". Its is the people behind this terror industry that i condemn(those responsible for religious brainwashing, those who pump them up with hatred--Arafat with his propagandistic TV programm as well--, those who take care of the logistics, who arm them etc, etc.)not the bombers themselves.
For the sake of peace, assuming that u need exactely those poor guys for making it, i wouldnt support an expansion of the settlements, may it be juristically justified or not...Sounds stupid but: Who gives a fuck?
About your point of "putting pressure on them, showing them that time's against them"..I i follow ur argumentation, the more peaceful i am, the more settlements i should build...Look at the political landscape and tell me whos in favour of settlements, and whos the one shouting "peace now, give them all we got" correct. it's a nice explanation, does have point..but its not convincing. After Israel isnt in some political vacuum. The world as biased as it may be, does want to have an Israel, and if it is only since they dint want those Jews in their own country..
"I am not saying Israel is Good, I am saying Israel is Good and the Palestinians are Bad. See I am comparing Israel to the Palestinians and deciding. "
That is what i wanted you to say in the first place (in my previous posting) since it gives us more credibility.
..you say Israel made x but the Palestinian's y is much worse. Okay, that might be true, but Id prefer if we looked at ourselves only. What can WE do in order to deescalate? I once again referr to the "constructive middle east discussion" not the "defending" one 
"Secondly, you conclude that Israel must evacuate all Jewish settlements before a final peace agreement cam be achieved with the Palestinians. This is wrong, since this is where many settlement critics imply that it would be better for peace if the West Bank were Judenrein (empty of Jews). "
Show me where i wrote THAT!? Dont exaggerate or let yaself go in paranoia...I never talked about ALL settlements! Firstly i think the expansion during the peace process was a contraproductive "betrayel" an abuse of trust (in THEIR eyes, but we HAVE to accept or at least understand that view!) Secondly..i think that most of the settlements should remain, maybe the should be put together to a few "blocks" (Less streets--> land confiscating necessary etc.) Thirdly i wouldnt miy nazi words such as Judenrein(which i have heared a LOT in that settlement-issue context) with the Israeli- Arab conflict. Makes us look paranoide..IMO
About Hebron etc...Again: Comparing is a sign of weakness.
As for the checkpoints: Yes i agree, no soldiers lets some pregnant woman die intentionally. Again this provokes hatred but in this case its all due to Arafat's politics, his Intifada, his mistake!
Well the Beduin and Arab situation isnt THAT bad (some fanatics like the jewish anti.semite Chomsky call it apartheid but well...) but must be improved. According to some surveys Beduins identfy more with the Palestinian side and are against the zionist country.
"Although, I never still understand what their problem was living under Israel" I do. The Russians could have said the same about us a 100 years ago. Every people wants self determination, may it be the Curs, us or some Tibetians!
I rpeat that what we can do right now is just sit and wait, an dkeep the losses of both sides on a minimum..yeah
___________________
"Those are my principles, if you don't like them... well, I have others.”
|