quote:

Originally posted by Jarvmeister If that was truely the view of the consumer, then car manufacturers would design their cars like this today. This highlights the 'subjective' view you, and indeed I, have. This also applies to old and new trance. Sone people like that retro sound. I dig piano, like in Anjo - Sunrise, but a production like that today would not cut it. But I still think it rocks.

Well, i believe it's because it takes alot more time and effort to create shapes and details that today would'nt be effective to make enough profit. Anyway, this should'nt turn into a car argument.

It's my subjective opinion indeed, but i still think that there was alot more effort and creativity in producing ealier, that now has gone more over to dj'ing as Rebel pointed out.

___________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

distant, don't be a bloody bag , this thread doesn't examine the experience and expertise of TAs lol.

quote:

Originally posted by Jarvmeister I'm trying to make the only variable in the 'experiment' the technology.

Yes, thats what i'm trying to tell you ALL this time. That music, is not determined solely by the "technology" variable. It is rather mostly determined by the "aesthetics" variable.


If you are going to compare two tracks in the production level, then yes a newer track will be better one ok?Agreed?




BUT


If you are going to compare two tracks in GENERAL, than the most AESTHETIC (something which is ofcourse subjective) will win. And Aesthetics are NOT determiend by the production level (maybe they are but mildly) BUT by the overall Structure of the song, the qualities of the melodies and the rhythms! So, please, leave this car analogy asside (or computer, or fridge or whatever other techonological advance comes in mind) because music is not determined by technology.Cool?

quote:

Originally posted by distant Cobalt listens more to late 90's progressive trance iirc. He's heard Harthouse, but what else? There's no context.

Yes, and here comes the thought train. Why the fuck would you need to have listened to every 12" on every label from 90-94 to know exactly what makes good late 90s prog trance? I don't think you're going to deny to me that the late 90s were a good time for trance, so it's not about taste. I may as well start bossing you about and demanding to know how much you know about piano concertos before you can offer a valid opinion. Unless you're going to tell me there's a magic number of classic trance records you have to play before you gain some esoteric objective perspective of every sub-genre of trance from any era, all you're doing is making the argument "If you haven't listened to a lot of records in the sub-genre I like, then I'm going to call you wrong and clueless." Which is a crock.

We know what classic trance is. Not all of us are completely clueless. We know the template of original, pure, proper, correct trance. We may have listened to hundreds and hundreds of tracks in the style and yet we still prefer something different from you. There's absolutely no logic or reasoning that is connecting your argument of "Classic trance fans don't like this non-classic record" with "This track is definitely shit and everyone who thinks otherwise doesn't know anything about trance". You've just made a massive, arrogant assumption made out of a whole chain of small, arrogant assumptions.

EDITED.

quote:

And I have no problem with self-indulgence. I get really tired of people claiming that For An Angel (or some other whored out track) is the best track from that era. Well what else have you heard? "Well, uh... there's... Age of Love." NO SHIT! If that's all you've heard, then OF COURSE they're your favorites.

This is rhetoric begging argument. You're making huge assumptions and exaggerating them beyond all measure to try and back up your faulty logic. For all you know, Jarvmeister has listened to six thousand records from that era and still likes For An Angel, and even that has FA to do with how many classic trance records he's heard.

Y'know, I actually agree with a lot of your view. I don't like FAA and I never have. I think PVD has offered much better trance in almost every respect. I'd even maintain that it's a pretty atypical PVD track all told, out of line with a lot of his music from the era and it shouldn't be held as his trademark track as it actually is. But your arguments are fucking appalling and you're not going to win anything with them.

___________________
Mixes:
> Maximum Elevation [Progressive House]
> DI.FM 26th Anniversary Guest Mix [Progressive House]
> Live @ Dance:Love:Hub London, 11.10.2025
> Higher Peaks [Progressive House]
> Dance:Love:Hub Afterparty (The Return) 23.11.24

Like these sets? Come see me play live at Kibosh in Manchester: https://www.instagram.com/kibosh.mcr/

quote:

Originally posted by RebeL9 if you like that one check out De Niro - Elan Vital. ace tune

Oh. Thats gonna be a hard one to find. But thanks for the tip

___________________


http://soundcloud.com/subtara

quote:

Originally posted by PETRAN because music is not determined by technology.Cool?

Yes. Next Topic plz!

___________________


http://soundcloud.com/subtara

Most people who I see praising For An Angel are new to trance, listen to the newest, trendiest crap, and so forth. I'm talking about hundreds of people that all follow that same description, so I think my assumption is valid.

And there's more. Let's look at the Discogs crowd. All (well, most) fine people whose opinions I respect because they've stuck to it and created a base of knowledge when it comes to old techno and trance. And nobody likes For An Angel.

So we have two vastly separate groups here, judging the same genre of music. If it were a life or death situation, who would I trust? Well, the newbies have heard about... five records. Contra Frankie Bones, who owns tens of thousands.

Eh.

Anyway, to conclude, if you truly think For An Angel is the best record of 94, I will most probably assume you're clueless (unless something else makes me think you aren't). Because after all, that opinion doesn't mean squat unless I know it's been formed through extensive listening.

quote:

Originally posted by SYSTEM-J Yes, and here comes the thought train. Why the fuck would you need to have listened to every 12" on every label from 90-94 to know exactly what makes good late 90s prog trance?

I wasn't saying that at all, I think my comment might have been confusing. All I was saying is that I don't consider him an early 90's trance enthusiast. Sorry if that confused you.

To me PVD's earlier works like "For an Angel" is up there with classics by the likes of legends such as Donna Summer, BT, Kraftwerk, Prodigy, Depeche Mode and so on.

groundbreaking stuff!

Yes it is old.

No I will not stop listening to "For an angel" anytime soon.

Last edited by justin on Jan-30-2007 at 02:27

quote:

Originally posted by distant Anyway, to conclude, if you truly think For An Angel is the best record of 94, I will most probably assume you're clueless (unless something else makes me think you aren't). Because after all, that opinion doesn't mean squat unless I know it's been formed through extensive listening.

he was talking about the e-werk remix if i remember correctly.

___________________
Official Site - www.sterilis.co.uk

quote:

Originally posted by Subtle Oh. Thats gonna be a hard one to find. But thanks for the tip

if you like elan vital then you should definitely check out covert dub by chritian west!!

quote:

Originally posted by justin groundbreaking stuff!

See this is exactly what I'm talking about, SYSTEM-J.

What in the world would make anyone think this track is groundbreaking?

were talking about '94 right... I was still listening to nirvana and smashing pumpkins back then so I really can't talk can i?