 |
|
|
|
 |
Semirk
.
Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Rugby, England
|
|
|
Awesome set, introduced me to some great tracks I've now bought. Couldn't fault anything.
|
|
Jul-21-2007 19:45
|
|
|
 |
 |
chadi
Senior tranceaddict

Registered: Oct 2006
Location: United States
|
|
|
I guess I'll be the first to offer a less TA-esque opinion.
With all due respect for your musical preference and those who share it,...I have to admit that it left something to be desired...not because it was a poor representation of the kind of "music" that you LIKE, but because it fails to actually even qualify as beautiful music to me, unless, of course I tried to fool myself that if I were to enter into some "greater" and "deeper" mindframe I might be able to appreciate it's majestically subtle beauty. I guess we could try to sound really sophisticated here but maybe its time we get a little real with ourselves. The whole "music" structure itself just screams too much of the pseudo-elitest sound, replete with a random array of electronic noises that fail to really produce a flowing or purposeful harmony.
I also can't see how this could be hypnotic unless someone is under the influence of substances, otherwise it's just rather boring and needlessly repetitive. We obviously all have our opinions on what we find "hypnotic"...Personally my tastes call for a more heavy emphasis on melodic patterns in conjunction with danceable beats....not to be confused with shallow commercial productions.
"trance music" to me represents a concept of a style of music that is beautiful, danceable, euphoric and even emotional...and I find it rather disheartening to find so many former-trance fans eventually trying to pretend that they have achieved some higher level of musical appreciation by "progressing" into less and less musically recognizable productions.... I mean, how minimal and noisy and bereft of melody does music have to get before we can finally get over this foolish fear of being called a cheeshead?
With that said, I wish you all the very best in your pursuits and passions!
Last edited by chadi on Jul-26-2007 at 00:49
|
|
Jul-25-2007 22:54
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
chadi
Senior tranceaddict

Registered: Oct 2006
Location: United States
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by nefardec
and i just finished eating a cheesesteak 
i am a little confused by your actual criticism though
sounds like you're just against a new type of music that you can't get into
i absolutely love trance, just not saccharine trance with simplistic rhythms and obvious melodies/chord progressions. there is 'cheese' in every genre, where i think 'cheese' would be defined as something that sticks absurdly and unoriginally close to the guidlines of a specific 'genre' in order to gain popular appeal or easy understanding. i listened to this kind of thing at one point in my life because i knew nothing else. as i deejayed and lived more i started to develop different ideas about what is important to me, and this mix is the result of this process - it's where i'm at right now. i have mixes from two years ago that might be right up your alley.
no sweat if you didn't like it - i'm glad you gave it a listen |
My criticism is specifically targeted toward a growing movement in the EDM scene which pretentiously prides itself in being able to reach a higher level of musical consciousness beyond that of a regular listening individual. (Keeping in mind that I believe this is actually true to some extent. I find far too many people unable to appreciate more complex productions that I myself enjoy....my point addressing the excessive lengths of this concept, notwithstanding.
In other words, anything resembling a simple vocal, guitar or piano arragement would be considered "cheese" (a relative and broad word) because it is considered too "recognizable".
Ultra-elitism, which happens to be phony IMO, leads to an inordinate preoccupation with trying to be so out of touch with anything that may actually have a pleasurable "hook" or recognizable "tune" that it generally finds itself digressing into a pile of senseless noise which is then dubbed "intelligent music".
Obviously I'm not trying to say that the tracks in your set have gone exactly THAT far, but they are certainly heading in that direction. And believe it or not, I already went through my phase of this, until I found myself realizing how silly it actually was (I never did get to the point where I could really enjoy the more random stuff).
Interestingly enough, I just ended up going right back to the more simple, yet relatively "sophisticated" trance that I was listening to before and realized that it wasn't necessary for me to think of it as something I've "grown out of". I've been listening to electronic music and trance for quite sometime, hence I understand that there are many phases that an individual may experience during their musical journey.
But with that said, the entire topic about music is so subjective anyway that I try to avoid creating a senseless debate over it, nevertheless I thought I'd state my opinion.
It all has to do with what rocks your boat mate!
Last edited by chadi on Jul-26-2007 at 00:52
|
|
Jul-26-2007 00:38
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:07.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|