quote:

Originally posted by DJ RANN Oh, and before I get flamingjune'd, .....

That made me laugh.... a lot!!!

quote:

Originally posted by RJT Beanfield - Tides (Ripperton Mix) is at 124.89

What do you use to find the BPM of your tracks?

Mixmeister tells me that
Beanfield - Tides (Ripperton Mix) is at 125.0

Mixed In Key tells me that
Beanfield - Tides (Ripperton Mix) is at 140.8 (Obviously this is wrong)

___________________
Here are my latest mixes:
Pepa - Pure Bliss (June 2007 Promo)
Pepa - Visual Thoughts (March 2007 Promo)
Pepa - Trippin' Again

Mash-ups:
Perasma Vs BT - Swing 2 Gravity (Pepa Live Mash-up)
I Trance You!

quote:

Originally posted by Pinokio What do you use to find the BPM of your tracks? Mixmeister tells me that Beanfield - Tides (Ripperton Mix) is at 125.0 Mixed In Key tells me that Beanfield - Tides (Ripperton Mix) is at 140.8 (Obviously this is wrong)

I check them all against MixMeister, Ableton, Rapid Evolution, Mixed in Key, and if necessary, maths.

If I get general agreement from them, I use the program assigned one - if not, I try to ration it out myself.

Interestingly enough, they all seem to be wrong about the same amount of time, and in reality, the most accurate one seems to be when you warp a track in Ableton properly.

All I know is that .1 is definitely noticeable enough to throw a mix out of wack if you aren't watching it/correcting it properly.

___________________
last minute disco dot net

use mixmeister it has been 100% acurate with every song ive ever bought since i converted to cd's (one year ago)

___________________
Eyad Allayla - drums cubana - di.fm - tribal house channel - twisted_techy_hooks

never had a problem with virtualdj

quote:

Originally posted by starboy use mixmeister it has been 100% acurate with every song ive ever bought since i converted to cd's (one year ago)

Yeah, pretty much... I don't use it for anything other than BPM analysis, but it does that well enough. There are times where the measurement will be off one way or another, but this is more typical with older trance. In those cases, its time to use your ears while previewing the next song to mix in. I mean, no one is blindly relying on this sort of thing and not listening to verify if things are sounding good, right?

Mixmeister is quite good when you want to see the bpm of a track.

I think if you play tunes in a similar or the same sub-genre or style, your going to find similar BPMs so it's not that hard. The BPM counter initially on Pioneer CDJs is accurate, but really matching the BPMs isn't so you should be able to tell. I don't really like to write BPMs of my tracks, because I do try to keep them around the same style. Most of the tracks I have are anywhere from 125 - 132 (Prog House/Trance) and then 133 - 140 (Epic/Melodic Trance).

I think DJs who play tracks with a larger variety of genres, styles with greater differences in BPMs (esp those who build the BPM up)should label the BPM of their tracks, but when you find so many around say 130 (as I do) and just go up or down from there...it isn't that hard to mix without labelling. I mean unless you don't have many tunes, who has the time to write down the BPM for each and every track? I guess if you did..it would be when you initially go to make a label for the track. I have hundreds of tracks, so it would take me quite sometime to label them.

quote:

Originally posted by Spirit5 who has the time to write down the BPM for each and every track? I guess if you did..it would be when you initially go to make a label for the track. I have hundreds of tracks, so it would take me quite sometime to label them.

thats why u do it as u buy them then it takes u no time at all.

___________________
http://www.prizelive.com/r/sleepydragon

quote:

Originally posted by sleepydragon thats why u do it as u buy them then it takes u no time at all.

Yeah I know, but I am not about to do that to all what 950 or so tracks I have from Beatport. Nevermind all the keys, it would take me months...and I have school starting. I just mix for fun so it doesn't really matter, though I would like to get better.

quote:

Originally posted by Spirit5 Yeah I know, but I am not about to do that to all what 950 or so tracks I have from Beatport. Nevermind all the keys, it would take me months...and I have school starting. I just mix for fun so it doesn't really matter, though I would like to get better.

Just start doing it with the new tunes you get from now on and when you find a free hour or something, have a blitz of some of your more recent stuff and get some of it marked up.

It's not as if your whole collection needs to be marked up for you to get any benefit from it, just take advantage of it when you're mixing tracks you have had the chance to label. I've only got the tracks I've got since January marked up (so probably less than 1/10 of my collection!) as I only started marking tempos on my tunes a few months ago, keys go back about a year further as I started doing that a while ago.

As I say, I don't really use it to help me beatmatch tracks (unless the tracks are exactly the same tempo in which case it can save a few seconds, but even then isn't always perfect) - I just use it for harmonic mixing. If you can mix fine without tempos marked and you're not too fussed about harmonic mixing then it's probably not worth doing it.

___________________
Stu Cox |