|
| quote: | Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Since you don't believe me, I'll let a Constitutional scholar, rather than Wikipedia, make the argument for me. The following from Charles Beard:
Excerpted from Charles Beard's "Framing the Constitution," in Peter Woll, ed., American Government: Readings and Cases, 11th ed. (New York: Harper Collins, 1993) |
I'd say we have two choices
a propaganda technique:
| quote: | An appeal to authority also known as argument from authority, argumentum ad verecundiam (Latin: argument from modesty) or ipse dixit (Latin: he himself, said it), is one method of obtaining propositional knowledge.
Example of appeals to authority:
Referencing scientific research published in a peer reviewed journal. "Science (in the form of an article in a prestigious journal) says X, therefore X is so" |
or a logical fallacy:
| quote: | Appeal to Misleading Authority
- Appeal to Authority
- Argument from Authority
- Argumentum ad Verecundiam
Translation: "Argument from respect/modesty" (Latin)
- Ipse Dixit
Translation: "He, himself, said it" (Latin)
Type: Genetic Fallacy
Form:
Authority A believes that P is true.
Therefore, P is true.
#3 The authority is an expert, but is not disinterested. That is, the expert is biased towards one side of the issue, and his opinion is thereby untrustworthy.
For example, suppose that a medical scientist testifies that ambient cigarette smoke does not pose a hazard to the health of non-smokers exposed to it. Suppose, further, that it turns out that the scientist is an employee of a cigarette company. Clearly, the scientist has a powerful bias in favor of the position that he is taking which calls into question his objectivity.
There is an old saying: "A doctor who treats himself has a fool for a patient," and a similar version for attorneys: "A lawyer who defends himself has a fool for a client." Why should these be true if the doctor or lawyer is an expert on medicine or the law? The answer is that we are all biased in our own causes. A physician who tries to diagnose his own illness is more likely to make a mistake out of wishful thinking, or out of fear, than another physician would be.
http://www.fallacyfiles.org/authorit.html
|
A little about Mr. Beard:
| quote: | | Charles Austin Beard (November 27, 1874 – September 1, 1948) is widely regarded, along with Frederick Jackson Turner, as one of the two most influential American historians of the early 20th century. While Beard published hundreds of monographs, textbooks and interpretive studies in both history and political science, he is most widely known for his radical re-evaluation of the Founding Fathers of the United States, whom he believed were more motivated by economics than by philosophical principles. |
Those elite bankers couldn't possibly have a little more sway in the scholastic community than they do, could they? It would be fitting if that man (or his department) was rewarded with a large grant or a private endowment after that POS was published.
| quote: | "It is not what the man of science believes that distinguishes him, but how and why he believes it. His beliefs are tentative, not dogmatic; they are based on evidence, not on authority or intuition."
- Bertrand Russell, A History of Western Philosophy, p. 527 |
|