Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Iranian recon ships probe US Naval Squadron
Pages (9): « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
Lemonad
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2005
Location: big ol Sydney

Video Up


notice the voice difference between this guy and the one the Pentagon put up.

If the Americans did make this ploy up then i guess they feel like idiots. They didn't think Iran would be taping their own version.

This whole incident reminds me of the Gulf of Tonkin incident

Last edited by Lemonad on Jan-11-2008 at 23:26

Old Post Jan-11-2008 10:58  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for Lemonad Click here to Send Lemonad a Private Message Add Lemonad to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
LazFX
Supreme tranceaddict



Registered: Aug 2004
Location: 9th Circle

A shame.....

Old Post Jan-11-2008 15:44  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for LazFX Click here to Send LazFX a Private Message Visit LazFX's homepage! Add LazFX to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism



Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas

quote:
Originally posted by Lemonad
This whole incident reminds me of the Gulf of Tonkin incident


really? hold old were you in 1964?



embed...for comparison's sake.

Old Post Jan-12-2008 00:36  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Q5echo Click here to Send Q5echo a Private Message Add Q5echo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism



Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas

quote:
Originally posted by Lemonad
notice the voice difference between this guy and the one the Pentagon put up.


thats because in this version you are listening to a radio operator from CG 73 the Port Royal.

in the American version another radio operator identifies ambiguously "coalition warship" and CG 73 is aft.


EDIT> in the American version you can hear on the bridge to bridge frequency the radio operator in the Iranian version CG 73 Port Royal.

Old Post Jan-12-2008 00:49  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Q5echo Click here to Send Q5echo a Private Message Add Q5echo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Lemonad
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2005
Location: big ol Sydney

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
really? hold old were you in 1964?


So i see, is that how you talk to a History teacher or professor?

It's like saying that they have to be born in the era of the Roman or Persian Empire to talk about the history behind the empires.

Old Post Jan-12-2008 00:54  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for Lemonad Click here to Send Lemonad a Private Message Add Lemonad to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism



Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas

quote:
Originally posted by Lemonad
So i see, is that how you talk to a History teacher or professor?


no dude. just you.

Old Post Jan-12-2008 01:16  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Q5echo Click here to Send Q5echo a Private Message Add Q5echo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Lemonad
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2005
Location: big ol Sydney

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
no dude. just you.


Wow nice comeback man, i feel all down...

Old Post Jan-12-2008 01:29  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for Lemonad Click here to Send Lemonad a Private Message Add Lemonad to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
MisterOpus1
Grumpy Old Fart



Registered: Dec 2001
Location: Kansas City

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
really? hold old were you in 1964?


Gotta admit that's not the best argument to have.

Besides, it was a hoax:

quote:
Report reveals Vietnam War hoaxes, faked attacks

3 days ago

WASHINGTON (AFP) — North Vietnamese made hoax calls to get the US military to bomb its own units during the Vietnam War, according to declassified information that also confirmed US officials faked an incident to escalate the war.

The report was released by the National Security Agency, responsible for much of the United States' codebreaking and eavesdropping work, in response to a "mandatory declassification" request, the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) said Monday.

From the first intercepted cable -- a 1945 message from Vietnamese leader Ho Chi Minh to his Russian counterpart Joseph Stalin -- to the final evacuation of US spies from Saigon, the 500-page report retold Vietnam War history from the perspective of "signals intelligence," the group said in a statement.

During the war, North Vietnamese intelligence units sometimes succeeded in penetrating US communications systems, and they could monitor American message traffic from within, according to the report "Spartans in Darkness."

On several occasions "the communists were able, by communicating on Allied radio nets, to call in Allied artillery or air strikes on American units," it said.

"That's something I have never heard before," Steven Aftergood, director of the FAS project on government secrecy, told AFP.

But he said that probably the "most historically significant feature" of the declassified report was the retelling of the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident.

That was a reported North Vietnamese attack on American destroyers that helped lead to president Lyndon Johnson's sharp escalation of American forces in Vietnam.

The author of the report "demonstrates that not only is it not true, as (then US) secretary of defense Robert McNamara told Congress, that the evidence of an attack was 'unimpeachable,' but that to the contrary, a review of the classified signals intelligence proves that 'no attack happened that night,'" FAS said in a statement.

"What this study demonstrated is that the available intelligence shows that there was no attack. It's a dramatic reversal of the historical record," Aftergood said.

"There were previous indications of this but this is the first time we have seen the complete study," he said.

http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM...Nc957JypHhNTMxQ


Anyway, I've got more to say about this current incident, but am a little pressed for time so I'll come back later.


___________________
Whence September dusk grows crisper still,
with leaves all crimson conquered,
I yearn to shout,
and dance about,
and stick pickles in my honker...

Old Post Jan-12-2008 01:31  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for MisterOpus1 Click here to Send MisterOpus1 a Private Message Add MisterOpus1 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism



Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas

quote:
Originally posted by Lemonad
Wow nice comeback man, i feel all down...



so what do you think of those radio operators i posted?

you seemed so sure of yourself.

Old Post Jan-12-2008 01:32  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Q5echo Click here to Send Q5echo a Private Message Add Q5echo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Q5echo
asymetrical scepticism



Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas

quote:
Originally posted by MisterOpus1
Gotta admit that's not the best argument to have.


sure it is, you see in the "Gulf of Persian incident" no one claimed they were attacked. simple huh?

please tell me yuor're cognizant enough, unlike Lemonade, to at least make that ditinction?

Old Post Jan-12-2008 01:35  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Q5echo Click here to Send Q5echo a Private Message Add Q5echo to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Lemonad
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2005
Location: big ol Sydney

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
so what do you think of those radio operators i posted?

you seemed so sure of yourself.


I'm starting to believe that a radio transmission onshore somewhere made those threats... or possibly a hoax.

After listening to the video you posted up, the static or distortion part did have some resemblances to the Iranian side but aside from that, the main threat about blowing up the US ships did not have a Iranian accent, more arab like.

Iranians who have bad english accents speak like the main video i posted, not the one the Americans posted.

Old Post Jan-12-2008 01:40  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for Lemonad Click here to Send Lemonad a Private Message Add Lemonad to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Lemonad
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Nov 2005
Location: big ol Sydney

quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
sure it is, you see in the "Gulf of Persian incident" no one claimed they were attacked. simple huh?


It was more in the statement that the troops were provoked. Dropping white boxes (which possibly contain bombs or birthday cakes), threatening troops aboard.. sounds like a good run up to war to feed the US public.

Last edited by Lemonad on Jan-12-2008 at 01:47

Old Post Jan-12-2008 01:41  Australia
Click Here to See the Profile for Lemonad Click here to Send Lemonad a Private Message Add Lemonad to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > Iranian recon ships probe US Naval Squadron
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (9): « 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackID - Track #4 - Misja Helsloot @ Create (03-18-2006) [2006] [0]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackKings Of Rhythm - Bomb Da Loop (Loop Da Loop Mix) w/ Murk - Reach For Me (Accapella) [2004]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 19:34.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!