damn, wanted to vote for 192 bpm, but voted for 160 instead.. oops..
Nov-13-2002 13:13
escee
q1dm6
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Perth, Australia
192 baby.
Nov-13-2002 14:02
Dj-Steve
Nu-NRGized
Registered: May 2002
Location: Thessaloniki
192 is l337, but few good frequencies don't sound at all. I have many tracks in 192 bitrate but 256 is good enough for me
___________________
Pure 30cm
Nov-24-2002 13:39
AcidAngel
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Wonderland
192
___________________
"I don't know the future.
I didn't come here to tell you how this is going to end.
Im going to show the world. A world without rules and controls. A world without borders and boundries. I don't know the future. I didn't come here to tell you how this is going to end. Im going to tell you how this is going to begin. A world where anything is possible...anything is possible...anything is possible" Astral Projection - Anything Is Possible
Jan-21-2003 13:19
Nalin
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
192 kbps
i can semi tolerate 160 kbps
i hear no difference between 192 kbps and 256 kbps
Jan-21-2003 13:38
Trancer-adu
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Chicago, IL |USA| CTA# 8
have to go with 192
anything below is kinda but all the stuff above is great...
[EDIT]
wow, two Romanians posted after each other... what a rare occurance...
Jan-21-2003 17:07
Nalin
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
haha, lets make it three in a row
Jan-21-2003 21:57
m0sh
Ibiza 05'
Registered: Jan 2001
Location: Israel,kfar shmaryahu τως
192 kbps is fine
___________________
James Holden / Katana / Gabriel & Dresden / Sander Kleinenberg / Lemon 8 / Don Diablo / Infusion / Luke Chable / Nathan Fake / Michael Burns / Eric Prydz / Steve Angello / Tomcraft
James Holden is my only GOD!
Jan-21-2003 22:14
cbxzcm
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Daly City, California
"--alt-preset __________"
Jan-22-2003 02:51
kr00t0n
Archduke of Awesome
Registered: Feb 2002
Location: Hibernating
Fek, I cant really notice any difference from 128 up, but I now encode at 160, simply coz ppl complain if its any lower.
160 is still alright, the 1meg per minute ratio is one I like, nice and economical
