 |
|
|
|
 |
nrjizer
vive le deep

Registered: Jan 2001
Location: Bumfuck, GA
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Sadface
I dunno dude, it seems to me that most of the "reasons" supporting xone mixers were just pioneer bashing, ie: "its over marketed," "all the top trance dj's use it so it must suck," and finally "it has AN ANNOYING FLANGER ZOMG!"
The difference in sound quality isn't that huge, and some people prefer the curves on the 800 over the 92. Plus having the effects on the same box can be convenient, and saves money over buying an additional efx 1000. I think buying a mixer is a very subjective decision, and should be about personal feel more than anything else. Just because such and such famous DJ uses one or the other should be irrelevant. |
I have nothing against Pioneer stuff. The CDJ line is pretty much unmatched in its category, the EFX-1000 is an amazing piece of kit that is an inseperable part of my sets, and the DJM-800 is indeed a fine mixer (though the DJM-500/600 are very much overrated, imo). Anyone bashing a DJM-800 for the reasons you named is just as ignorant as its overzealous fanboys.
Yes, choosing a mixer is indeed subjective, and many of the finer details in the "Xone vs 800" debate are subjective as well (things such as fader/pot curves, analogue vs digital sound, the necessity of effects, etc). But I think the reason that most people are so feverous about Xones is the fact that if you take the effects away from the 800 then there's really nothing special about it, save for it's good sound.
___________________
NEW MIX [Feb/March 2008]
|
|
Jun-12-2008 20:21
|
|
|
 |
 |
Clovis
techno jungle shit

Registered: Apr 2004
Location: Los Angeles
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Sadface
I dunno dude, it seems to me that most of the "reasons" supporting xone mixers were just pioneer bashing, ie: "its over marketed," "all the top trance dj's use it so it must suck," and finally "it has AN ANNOYING FLANGER ZOMG!" |
Those reasons are not my issues with it, but the fact that people buy into those as selling points is what puts most of us off. The fact that trance DJs use it is less of a slight than the fact that people use that to argue that it is superior. The fact that it has a flanger doesn't bother me at all, it's the truth that it is mostly over-used, and should NOT be considered a "plus" unless you like cheap effects.
| quote: |
The difference in sound quality isn't that huge, and some people prefer the curves on the 800 over the 92. Plus having the effects on the same box can be convenient, and saves money over buying an additional efx 1000. I think buying a mixer is a very subjective decision, and should be about personal feel more than anything else. Just because such and such famous DJ uses one or the other should be irrelevant. |
Of course its subjective, but we're discussing each person's subjective opinions here not universal fact. RJT may present his posts in ways that lead some to think he believes his opinion to be absolute truth, but its really just his opinion. It remains that people often like one or the other for similar reasons, and it was pointed out that people who are very conscious about really mixing music and fine blending generally do NOT prefer the 800.
You can mix a great set on almost any of these mixers, but when it comes down to preference, the reasons why certain people choose one over the other are very telling and reflective of who they are as DJs.
___________________
| quote: | Originally posted by ********
Seplling don't demonstrate intelligence and educatoin - knowing does. |
|
|
Jun-12-2008 20:46
|
|
|
 |
 |
drEamer
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Madison, Wi
|
|
|
the topic had nothing to do with a XONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
Jun-12-2008 21:10
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:05.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|