 |
|
|
|
 |
rabbitjoker
aural sadist

Registered: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto, ON, CANADA
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by exstasie
The only thing I was getting at was that you can purchase a house with as little as 5% down, and in same cases not even that much. |
Up until recently in Canada people could buy homes with 0% down and still get high-ratio insurance on the mortgage (CMHC, Genworth, etc). Some lenders even offered negative-down mortgages where you could mortgage up to 110% of the value of the home (this was VERY common in the USA, and was available for a long period of time, whereas in Canada it was a more recent concept [<5 years]).
Also, US mortgages have longer amortization periods (up to 50 years in some case) - which IMO is a good idea as it gets more people owning homes. Canada was never this high, and 30-35 year amortizations were a relatively new concept (much like the 100+% financing).
5% purchases were (and still are) possible in Canada when buying resale homes. New builders require more due to the fact they need to finance construction costs.
Thanks to the conservative government 0% mortgages and amortizations above 30 years (?) are now uninsurable (CMHC said they wouldn't insure and the others followed suit).
The last thing to realize is in the USA, a portion of mortgage interest can be deducted against income to reduce taxes - which in concept should make it easier for one to buy a home. In reality however this only drove the home prices up (a $500k home in Canada is equal to a $800-900k home in the USA). The original idea was to give people the ability to buy a home with lower incomes but it had somewhat of the opposite impact as it drove prices artificially higher (in the more distant past) plus inflated a market in a time of easy credit (in the more recent past).
___________________
- rabbit.joker [funny¿rabbit] | www.rabbitjoker.com |www.ddtt.org
Dark Dirty Tech Tribal. | Hands in air (trance) and feet on the floor (house).
|
|
Feb-05-2009 20:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
Abercrombie
myspace.com/ashesband
Registered: Sep 2005
Location: Aurora Borealis
|
|
|
I was just about to search for this thread, and thank you for bumping it for my convenience.
I got this email last night from our CEO;
| quote: | | So we are going to take action. We have decided to further variablize our cost structure by reducing base pay and some benefits across HP. My base pay will be reduced by 20 percent. The base pay of Executive Council members will be reduced by 15 percent. The base pay of other executives will be reduced by 10 percent. The base pay of all other exempt employees will be reduced by 5 percent. For non-exempt employees, base pay will be reduced by two-and-a-half percent. Additional efficiencies, including changes to the US 401(k) plan and the share ownership plan, will also be implemented. Of course, the implementation of all of these actions is subject to compliance with local laws and regulations. Follow-up communications will detail the timing and the plans in your location." |
I already volunteered for 10 unpaid days this year (10 long weekends this summer, how selfish of me) which is a 5% pay cut, and now this additional mandatory 5% cut just blows, and I have to work through it too.
Days like this I wish there was work-to-rule in the salaried private sector, not gonna happen

___________________

Short time TA, Long time Guver, Good time giver.
|
|
Feb-19-2009 17:02
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:17.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|