 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
vinnie97
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: May 2004
Location: North TX
|
|
|
There's nothing wrong with stating the truth, Leb...if an entity accepts a large sum of federal money, why would one not expect some kind of mandate, requirement or direction in how it be used? I can understand how a state might prefer autonomy in the way it doles out some of the fiat money.
Also, the video I posted above plainly reveals what a single-payer system brings in terms of rationing, etc (i.e. waiting for even what many would deem emergency procedures to be provided). The Pres already made it clear this was his preference initially and is only backing down due to scrutiny, even from members within his own party. At the aforementioned privately insured animal clinic in Canada, the differences in are made abundantly clear and if commenting on that paints me in some unfavorable light, guilty as charged.
You mention this language from OpenCongress ensuring the private option as know it stays intact but I can't help but be a little skeptical:
| quote: | | And when you do, scroll down to subsection C, which states that “Individual health insurance coverage that is not grandfathered health insurance coverage under subsection (a) may only be offered on or after the first day of Y1 as an Exchange-participating health benefits plan.” In other words, after the bill becomes law, all new health insurance plans would have to be purchased through the Health Insurance Exchange, which, according to a House committee summary, is a “marketplace for individuals and small employers to comparison shop among private and public insurers.” The provision Investor’s Business Daily latched onto in is, in reality, all about increasing choice and competition in the marketplace between both public and private health insurance options, not limiting choice. |
I *may* have jumped the gun on the direct IRS <--> bank account connection but that tax cheat, Rangel, is trying to make it more difficult for the average taxpayer under the guise of one incarnation of the health bill nonetheless:
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/nation...x7Iuvsy30uFmFfI
|
|
Sep-07-2009 00:23
|
|
|
 |
 |
Lebezniatnikov
Stupidity Annoys Me

Registered: Feb 2004
Location: DC
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by vinnie97
There's nothing wrong with stating the truth, Leb...if an entity accepts a large sum of federal money, why would one not expect some kind of mandate, requirement or direction in how it be used? |
What are you basing this on? See, this is my problem. There seems to be an awful lot of assuming going on. Have you read the bill? It seems kind of pointless to make hypothetical statements about what you would expect the bill to say when you could take the hour or two and read through the text.
| quote: | | Also, the video I posted above plainly reveals what a single-payer system brings in terms of rationing, etc (i.e. waiting for even what many would deem emergency procedures to be provided). |
That's great, but I don't watch youtube videos to substitute for argumentation. I know I posted a video in this thread earlier, but I did so fully expecting that nobody would watch it - and I've said over and over that anybody else posting a video in lieu of facts or an argument should expect the same. The primary reason being that nothing is fact-checked or cited in videos - as a result, most videos are full of supposition, exaggeration, and very little fact. The secondary reason being that when I'm at my computer, I'm not muting my music and sitting in a thread for 10 minutes to watch a video that may or may not be coherent. Videos are generally a non-starter in this sub-forum.
| quote: | | You mention this language from OpenCongress ensuring the private option as know it stays intact but I can't help but be a little skeptical: |
Then address your skepticism by reading the portions of the bill cited by the text. It's not like this is classified information.
| quote: | | I *may* have jumped the gun on the direct IRS <--> bank account connection but that tax cheat, Rangel, is trying to make it more difficult for the average taxpayer under the guise of one incarnation of the health bill nonetheless: |
Again, read the text of the bill that is being debated. Spin is full of spin. Not to mention that Rangel is senile and will not be the author of a bill that reaches the floor.
___________________
|
|
Sep-07-2009 05:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
Lira
Ancient BassAddict

Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Brasilia, Brazil
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by DOOMBOT
From what I've gathered, the Brazilian model is severely underfunded as well. Quality of care is also pretty bad. So what happens when it can't be afforded anymore, as if it can be even right now? It's absolutely amazing. You can even get plastic surgery and sex change operations under the public system down there. |
Wait, I don't understand your point - are you saying that it is a good thing that you can get plastic surgeries under the public system? Either way, I should warn you that it only happens in extreme cases (i.e. you were involved in a nasty accident and you need to have your nose reconstructed, or something like that).
As for the quality of care being bad, it depends quite a lot on the region, and it has to do with the economy more than with anything else (keep in mind that we're one of the greatest world economies, but we're still working on social equality). The US being the country it is, that's hardly a problem.
___________________
Indiana Clones Upcoming Sets
[ I May Upload Something Someday ]
|
|
Sep-07-2009 05:53
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:56.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|