 |
|
|
|
 |
Schadenfreude
Bird is the word.

Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa- Pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-ooma-mow-
|
|
|
Dec-30-2009 16:28
|
|
|
 |
 |
Schadenfreude
Bird is the word.

Registered: Oct 2009
Location: Pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa- Pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-pa-ooma-mow-
|
|
|
Dec-30-2009 16:36
|
|
|
 |
 |
84th Ave.
Deep & Drums

Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Owl's Cabin
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Schadenfreude
maybe it is just me, but i don't go to see a movie for cheesy in your face non stop visuals.
do you like pro wrestling too?
I want to get involved in a plot. I want to be kept thinking. I used to like stupid movies once in awhile as a guilty pleasure, because there were less of them back in the day. For the last 5 years at least, it is almost nothing but stupidity coming out of Hollywood. All you have to do is look at how they are raping everything from the 80's/early 90's at the moment to show you that there are no new ideas.
Hollywood has become trance.
300 was brutal. The last 2 films i actually enjoyed on Imax were The Dark Knight and Disney's Earth. They were both visually stunning and had some substance to them. Had they had none, the visuals would not be enough.
Avatar is the Ed Hardy of movies. Just a shitload of crap thrown onto something that ends up being hideous, yet the people who don't like to think the most gravitate to it |
i used to love pro wrestling
all your reasons i agree with you, but your missing the point. This movie set the visual bar above anything else. Dark Knight was one of my favorites movies as well, but you cannot compare the two, 'visually'.
like i said before, i would go pay another 9 dollars just to see the visuals again, not to be amazed by the story or characters
Hollywood has become the present, which is filled with technology. Forget the original and brilliance of the 80s and 90s.
|
|
Dec-31-2009 09:51
|
|
|
 |
 |
klobo
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2008
Location: Montreal
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by sonic monkey
I just came back from the movies and I got to say that the film is
amazing. Totally worth the money but here's my quick non-spoiler review:
+Mind Blowing Visuals
+Predictable but EPIC movie
+Sigourney Weaver!!!
-No memorable dialogues
-No memorable action sequences
-Weak Character development
All in all, I really enjoyed this movie but it was missing some elements that made previous James Cameron movies a classic imo. Remember the unforgetable (stylish) moments or the iconic characters we had with Terminator, Aliens, etc... ? Maybe my expectations were a bit high for a James Cameron movie but it was still a great experience. |
yay,somebody that has the exact thoughts i had about the movie!!
|
|
Dec-31-2009 17:15
|
|
|
 |
 |
WittyHandle
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Jun 2008
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by 84th Ave.
all your reasons i agree with you, but your missing the point. This movie set the visual bar above anything else. Dark Knight was one of my favorites movies as well, but you cannot compare the two, 'visually'.
like i said before, i would go pay another 9 dollars just to see the visuals again, not to be amazed by the story or characters
Hollywood has become the present, which is filled with technology. Forget the original and brilliance of the 80s and 90s. |
I don't think anyone's missing the point here. Some people are happy with accepting a movie for its visual appeal, and others need a good story. Both together are great, but this rarely happens.
I'd watch a film with a good story again (Dark Knight is a perfect example), but not one just for the visuals (such as Avatar). You might feel the opposite of this. Po-tay-to, po-tah-to.
As for saying that originality in Hollywood is forgotten, I disagree. It may be less common, but not gone altogether.
|
|
Dec-31-2009 20:53
|
|
|
 |
 |
84th Ave.
Deep & Drums

Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Owl's Cabin
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by WittyHandle
I don't think anyone's missing the point here. Some people are happy with accepting a movie for its visual appeal, and others need a good story. Both together are great, but this rarely happens.
I'd watch a film with a good story again (Dark Knight is a perfect example), but not one just for the visuals (such as Avatar). You might feel the opposite of this. Po-tay-to, po-tah-to.
As for saying that originality in Hollywood is forgotten, I disagree. It may be less common, but not gone altogether. |
i know where you are coming from, personally I am more into movies that have a rich story line with detail to characters, plot, etc.
my point is that I love to watch those movies in the comfort of my own home, i dont need an IMAX experience for those type of movies (like Blow, The Departed, etc)
going to the theater and getting what you get out of avatar is incomparable, again the visuals
I think alot of people were just expecting alot out of Cameron, I too, was expecting a more of a rich story, it was bland and predictable
|
|
Dec-31-2009 21:53
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:39.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|