|
I know it's not quite the same, but my girlfriend's mother has fairly advanced MS - she can't walk, stand up right, or use her hands adequately (unless it's to hold a pipe ). She can still scoot around to the bathtub, change her own clothes, etc. Maybe even prepare herself a meal sometimes, but generally it's up to my girlfriend to do a great deal of things for her, even prepare meals for her particularly picky appetite. She's no burden though - taking care of her is just a task, kind of like feeding yourself or doing other chores that have to be done.
I know it would be different having to wait on somebody hand and foot, never being able to let them out of your sight lest they hurt themselves, but I think that being in the situation will definitely change your mind about things. I don't blame Jenny for her stance in the least, indeed, I completely agree with her that preventing that situation is the most beneficial to absolutely every party involved and the choice to euthanize in certain scenarios is the logical one. But in situations like david.michael's for example, I could never bring myself to do what's logical. If you can't even get the sympathy to well up in you, then the hard logic of killing your own children and the measures instilled into us by our status as primarily social apes would probably stop you.
I obviously do not have any children of my own, but I know enough to know that having your own can change your perspective entirely. I would want to do what's best for me as well, but I think the benefit of knowing that I showed my offspring every bit of support and privelage I could muster would far exceed the lifelong contemplation and shame of what could have been. It can't be called sacrifice when the benefit outweighs the costs.
Nobody is autonomous anyways. And yes, this is coming from an island.
___________________
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
|