|
| quote: | Originally posted by John 00 Fleming
1) Purist?
No I’m not a purist and hate anything commercial (I’m close friends with Armin, A&B and never say anything bad against them). All I’m trying to do is help unlock the way promoters and some clubbers look at the scene and show there is another fruitful way. Often commercial Trance can be an easy gateway to get people into EDM, once in they may eventually discover me! Things shouldn’t be so separated. No reason why one week you should enjoy Armin dance your socks of to some anthems, then the following week have a heads down night being battered by some dark techno. That’s what the scene used to be about, then people chat about it after and share experiences. Forums seem to create bad vibes on discussions like this today ☹
|
Well said, John.
I think one of the main reason trance has become such a commonly unknown type of music, is that there doesn't seem to be any communication between the commercial and underground scene. It seems that the house scene on the other hand doesn't really have that problem.
You see, if the establishment and the resistance are kept seperated, both parties will suffer from inbreeding. The commercial scene becomes this, cheesy, fluffy and bland same-old, same-old. While the underground only makes this obscure, avant-garde insider-stuff that nobody outside will get.
Why do I nag about this? Well, I'm a bit bothered why trance music haven't had its Pink Floyd, 2Pac or Iron Maiden. Trance have only had the stuff that's either stuff that's only Top 40 values or the stuff nobody listens to. Why isn't there any artist trying to fill that huge gap between the mainstream and the underground? Heck, why isn't there anyone even recognizing it?
| quote: | 2) Producers & DJs
Phew here we go again! Producers and DJ’s are a team. We need each other and that will always be the case. No one can hide the fact that if a guy that has been sitting in a studio all his life is presented with DJing at a club he will have no idea what to do. Things used to work when producers came into clubs playing ‘live sets’. There is no better feeling watching a true music geek twiddling on keyboards, and FX. The crowd on the dancefloor will be in a different mind set knowing they are watching a live set, in the same way when you’re at a concert to see a band. After all you’re hearing all his tunes you love, and seeing him perform live (he plays them anyway in a DJ set anyway!). Once finished the DJ takes over. This format worked perfectly for years. I think today’s producers should take this approach I know for sure it’s more fun for them. This also lets more real DJ’s onto the circuit. ** In the same way Anton Chernikov performed a live set for me in Brighton** |
Good point, but you're forgetting about something. Electronic music is programmed, not performed. Since the invention of sequencers, you no longer have to have the talent of playing the guitar or the piano or whatever to create a masterpiece. Now, you just need to learn how to write music, something that gets easier with every new generation of sequencers.
The only reason that we have the illusion that performed music should be better than pre-recorded or programmed music, is because back in the very old days, like before the days of Edison, the only way you could listen to music would be to ACTUALLY SEE SOMEONE PERFORM IT. Today though, music is now reachable within a few button clicks and somehow it doesn't really feel the same as a live performance, even though it's EXACTLY THE SAME THING.
That is my main problem, that performance and presentation is somehow more important than the actual product, that is, THE MUSIC ITSELF. If you want the true benefits of live music, I can say that seeing Tron Legacy in an IMAX theatre will be the same experience as seeing Daft Punk playing the soundtrack on one of their gigs. I'm just saying.
___________________
An ideadump
|