 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Halcyon+On+On
Liebchen

Registered: Sep 2004
Location: midcoast
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Trance-MB
Looking at animals you can see they stop drinking milk after childhood as the body doesn't need milk. |
Quaint reasoning, but I am sure it has something more to do with the fact that it's terribly maladaptive for the females of the species to constantly be lactating to feed every member of the herd from birth to death because every member has a strict nutritional dependency upon it that never waned. It makes more sense that near to sexual maturation and autonomy, members grow to procure their own food through hunting or gathering, so that their mother can devote social and biological resources toward new offspring, furthering their genetic line. Nou, are you writing this down?
The evolution of humans from hunter-gatherers to agriculturalists was not exactly uniform across all societies, and that could be due to innumerable geographical and psychosocial factors. For example, perhaps (speculation, here) the damp soil or fauna of eastern Asia prevented cattle husbandry to the point where milk would have been a cost-effective resource- perhaps smaller animals such as pigs and goats were more conducive to the satellite farms of their family and cultural dynamic, making meat from said animals a better source of nutrition than allowing them to live as milk machines.
In contrast, the rocky ground of Europe and thus the Northern European descent into North America produced a stock of people who came from an environment and culture that came to value particular agricultural techniques conducive to their topography; one actual example I know of is the presence of butter and cream in Northern Italian cooking versus the presence of olive oil in southern Italian cooking. The terrain shift and the ability for Northern Italy's soil to handle large, hooved animals like cattle has everything to do with this dietary shift as Southern Italy's soft, wet soil would tend to make a poor environment for those same beasts.
Obviously there is a ton of conjecture on my behalf, but I think it's mere circumstance and evolutionary artifact that many humans have evolved an almost programmed intolerance for certain dairy. The fact is that if it doesn't affect you adversely, it's not only safe, but a nutritional, vitamin-rich product that many humans have certainly re-adapted to consuming once agricultural means developed to the point they are at in our current age.
___________________
There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio,
Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
Last edited by Halcyon+On+On on Oct-25-2012 at 20:05
|
|
Oct-25-2012 19:54
|
|
|
 |
 |
Trance-M
Since 1994 tranceaddict

Registered: Oct 2005
Location: Limburg, Netherlands
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Halcyon+On+On
Quaint reasoning, but I am sure it has something more to do with the fact that it's terribly maladaptive for the females of the species to constantly be lactating to feed every member of the herd from birth to death because every member has a strict nutritional dependency upon it that never waned. It makes more sense that near to sexual maturation and autonomy, members grow to procure their own food through hunting or gathering, so that their mother can devote social and biological resources toward new offspring, furthering their genetic line. Nou, are you writing this down?
The evolution of humans from hunter-gatherers to agriculturalists was not exactly uniform across all societies, and that could be due to innumerable geographical and psychosocial factors. For example, perhaps (speculation, here) the damp soil or fauna of eastern Asia prevented cattle husbandry to the point where milk would have been a cost-effective resource- perhaps smaller animals such as pigs and goats were more conducive to the satellite farms of their family and cultural dynamic, making meat from said animals a better source of nutrition than allowing them to live as milk machines.
In contrast, the rocky ground of Europe and thus the Northern European descent into North America produced a stock of people who came from an environment and culture that came to value particular agricultural techniques conducive to their topography; one actual example I know of is the presence of butter and cream in Northern Italian cooking versus the presence of olive oil in southern Italian cooking. The terrain shift and the ability for Northern Italy's soil to handle large, hooved animals like cattle has everything to do with this dietary shift as Southern Italy's soft, wet soil would tend to make a poor environment for those same beasts.
Obviously there is a ton of conjecture on my behalf, but I think it's mere circumstance and evolutionary artifact that many humans have evolved an almost programmed intolerance for certain dairy. The fact is that if it doesn't affect you adversely, it's not only safe, but a nutritional, vitamin-rich product that many humans have certainly re-adapted to consuming once agricultural means developed to the point they are at in our current age. |
All true, but I didn't want to go that deep. My parents both grew up at a farm.
Mostly I drink low-fat milk by the way.
___________________

Longest (classic) Trance playlist on YouTube (5000 tracks released up to and including 1997), click here
|
|
Oct-25-2012 20:19
|
|
|
 |
 |
DOOMBOT
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Sep 2004
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by srussell0018
Nothing about milk is bad for people in general. It is only certain people's bodies that are incapable of properly digesting it. |
From what I understand, there is an enzyme in milk, before pasteurization, that helps your body digest the milk without you getting a stomach ache or feeling ill. When milk is pasteurized, that enzyme is essentially burned out of the milk. Of course, the milk at your typical grocery store has to be pasteurized, considering the condition it is in when it comes out of the cows that are used because those cows are raised in conditions that make them sick and the milk contaminated with a lot of things that will make you as the consumer sick once it enters your body. Milk that comes from a cow that is grass fed and is allowed to move around on a field is a lot safer to drink.
I've given milk to people who think they are "lactose intolerant" and they were fine after drinking it. Again, it's the milk that is pasteurized that is going to give these people problems because the enzyme is gone and their body just can't put it down properly.
As for me, I just love the taste of milk that comes out of a properly raised and fed cow that goes directly to the bottle.
|
|
Oct-25-2012 20:46
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:41.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|