Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > What the F#ck is N. Korea Doing?
Pages (6): « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
Johan (DJ Irish)
dj bum



Registered: Aug 2000
Location: Malmööööö!

quote:
Originally posted by Arbiter
Gotta start somewhere. I don't think Iraq's the best choice, but it's better than doing nothing. I'd like to see the U.S. riding around the world rescuing people from evil. But what I'd really like to see is other countries doing it too, instead of just sitting on their hands acting like its not their problem that people are suffering.


Well, unfortunatly I don't think there is one country on this planet that has "improving the state of the world" very high up on their agenda. It's all about self interests and it's nothing new about that. However, it doesn't mean every country is sticking their head in the sand and twiddle their thumbs at the same time. There are more ways in trying to make a change than starting war. There's no fool proof way of course but war always causes immens suffering among the people that the war is trying to "help". And democracy and freedom doensn't happen of it's self after the opressor has been removed. Simply put, there are no short term way of "liberating" a country. Monetary aid, education and rebuilding infrastructures, hospitals, schools etc, monitoring elections all have to be included. People who have never experienced democracy won't pick it up first time trying.

What I'm trying to say here is that from what I know of the U.S. plans regarding the war in Iraq there hasn't been much thoughts about what the hell to do afterwards that would actually benefit the people in the ways needed. After getting their family killed by bombs the affected people will probably only regard the U.S. as the biggest terrorist state of them all and not really accept a leadership in bed with the U.S. government. Plus will the U.S. actually stay long enough to really rebuild the country? If not, this will not help the war against terrorism a single bit.

Old Post Feb-03-2003 10:22 
Click Here to See the Profile for Johan (DJ Irish) Click here to Send Johan (DJ Irish) a Private Message Visit Johan (DJ Irish)'s homepage! Add Johan (DJ Irish) to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Arbiter
Naked Power Organ



Registered: May 2002
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by Dj_Irish
Well, unfortunatly I don't think there is one country on this planet that has "improving the state of the world" very high up on their agenda. It's all about self interests and it's nothing new about that. However, it doesn't mean every country is sticking their head in the sand and twiddle their thumbs at the same time. There are more ways in trying to make a change than starting war. There's no fool proof way of course but war always causes immens suffering among the people that the war is trying to "help". And democracy and freedom doensn't happen of it's self after the opressor has been removed. Simply put, there are no short term way of "liberating" a country. Monetary aid, education and rebuilding infrastructures, hospitals, schools etc, monitoring elections all have to be included. People who have never experienced democracy won't pick it up first time trying.

What I'm trying to say here is that from what I know of the U.S. plans regarding the war in Iraq there hasn't been much thoughts about what the hell to do afterwards that would actually benefit the people in the ways needed. After getting their family killed by bombs the affected people will probably only regard the U.S. as the biggest terrorist state of them all and not really accept a leadership in bed with the U.S. government. Plus will the U.S. actually stay long enough to really rebuild the country? If not, this will not help the war against terrorism a single bit.


Oh, I agree completely. My support for the war is conditional upon our willingness to spend the time and money afterwards to actually ensure stability in Iraq and to rebuild infrastructure that would be destroyed by a war. I have some doubts about the U.S. government's willingness to do this, but you can't really justify anything under the assumption you're just going to screw it up later.

Old Post Feb-03-2003 15:16 
Click Here to See the Profile for Arbiter Click here to Send Arbiter a Private Message Add Arbiter to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
intrinsic
Senior tranceaddict



Registered: Apr 2001
Location: Chicago
Monkey Dancer 2

quote:
Originally posted by FuzzyGreen
Hell NO we should not give them economic aid. I'm just trying to answer the original question as to why NKorea is doing this crap. I think we should attack NKorea as soon as we are done with Iraq/terrorists.


I don't think we should give NK anymore aid either. I honestly feel that we should significantly cut back on foreign aid and put it to use domestically....

Old Post Feb-04-2003 14:20  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for intrinsic Click here to Send intrinsic a Private Message Add intrinsic to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
vmc
Travelling Without Moving



Registered: Jan 2002
Location: Poland

quote:
Originally posted by FuzzyGreen
Hell NO we should not give them economic aid. I'm just trying to answer the original question as to why NKorea is doing this crap. I think we should attack NKorea as soon as we are done with Iraq/terrorists.


WTF is going on with you people?

Who gave you rights to tell others what to do and attack who you want? What do you want to do, invade the whole world? Attack anyone who think the other way then you? Bomb every country whose government you don't like? Too bad there's no sort of power such ass USSR in the past that could make you stop threating of attack every country that doesn't do as your interest is.

Osama was a prick for 2 reasons:
1) he killed thousands of innocent people
2) he gave Americans excuse for later military agressions against 'countries that support terrorism', which they rapidly turned into 'countries that don't support American interests'

Do you think you have ruled the world or something? Mind your own business!


___________________
PvD Planet

Old Post Feb-04-2003 16:44  Poland
Click Here to See the Profile for vmc Click here to Send vmc a Private Message Add vmc to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
stringfelowhawk
Roboflow



Registered: May 2002
Location: Boston, MA

Some facts for you all...

North Korea has an army of 1.4 million. Of that, 70% of them are within 24 hours of the DMZ. Also, they have one of the largest field artillery units in the world that is capable of obliterating Seoul withing 24 hours.

This is compared to the 'nuclear tripwire' of 37,000 troops the US has stationed there. Our troops are only a deterant of an attack because we reserve the right to use nukes if NK would come down there. Exactly the same situation we had with the Russians as occrider mentioned before, conventional forces are completely worthless in this sense. What we are saying is basically go ahead and attack South Korea and we'll turn your country into a glow in the dark parking lot.


___________________
"We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of the dreams"
~Willy Wonka~

Old Post Feb-05-2003 19:56  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for stringfelowhawk Click here to Send stringfelowhawk a Private Message Add stringfelowhawk to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
FuzzyGreen
Music Addict



Registered: May 2001
Location: Bay Area, Ca USA

quote:
Originally posted by DJ_Skaya
We're in most respects the most powerful country in the world. Technically, we're an immediate threat to everyone. Are they starting war on us?


Yes, we are a threat to everyone since we can easily wipe any country off the face of the planet within one day. But we don't and have no intentions or history of doing so. Iraq has proven that they have intentions to do so many times.

quote:

I think you've listened to Bush too much, because obviously you consider Muslims and Iraqi's and Terrorists to be the same thing


Did I say "Muslims"? No I didn't, I said "Muslim extremists". This is VERY different.

Old Post Feb-05-2003 23:38  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for FuzzyGreen Click here to Send FuzzyGreen a Private Message Visit FuzzyGreen's homepage! Add FuzzyGreen to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
FuzzyGreen
Music Addict



Registered: May 2001
Location: Bay Area, Ca USA

quote:
Originally posted by vmc
Who gave you rights to tell others what to do and attack who you want? What do you want to do, invade the whole world? Attack anyone who think the other way then you? Bomb every country whose government you don't like?


Nope, Actually I would rather not have to deal with any other countries problems at all. I don't want the US to go to war with anyone, but I also am tired of living in fear of a terrorist attack or an Iraqi attack (of any sort). If we have to destroy Iraq in order to prevent future problems, then go for it. If people here in the US had attitudes like yours in WW2 you would be under Nazi rule right now.

Old Post Feb-05-2003 23:53  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for FuzzyGreen Click here to Send FuzzyGreen a Private Message Visit FuzzyGreen's homepage! Add FuzzyGreen to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Verona^My
full on addict



Registered: Apr 2002
Location: Rochester, NY

quote:
Originally posted by Arbiter
I want war so that every child born in Iraq will have the opportunity to grow up in a country where they are granted basic human rights, where they won't be killed for voicing their opinions, and where they'll have an opportunity to prosper economically and intellectually. Why does everyone seem to oppose giving them that opportunity?


And the #1 person on our list to replace Saddam is the general who gased the Kurds in the 80's. I hardly think this is an improvement for Iraq.

The USA's goal is clear, to establish feudal dominion over foreign powers, vassal states, etc.


___________________
Current fav albums

DNA, kick me up
Protoculture, Circadians

Old Post Feb-06-2003 09:27  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Verona^My Click here to Send Verona^My a Private Message Add Verona^My to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
stringfelowhawk
Roboflow



Registered: May 2002
Location: Boston, MA

quote:
Originally posted by Verona^My

The USA's goal is clear, to establish feudal dominion over foreign powers, vassal states, etc.


ya, that's clearly in our best interest


___________________
"We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of the dreams"
~Willy Wonka~

Old Post Feb-06-2003 12:47  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for stringfelowhawk Click here to Send stringfelowhawk a Private Message Add stringfelowhawk to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Other > Political Discussion / Debate > What the F#ck is N. Korea Doing?
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (6): « 1 2 3 4 5 [6]  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playback4. another good tune [2004] [1]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackGusto - Disco's Revenge (Mole Hole Dirty Mix) [2004]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:54.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!