quote:

Originally posted by DJ El Kay Dee just cos they know that Iraq cant defend itself against such a combat

they are believed to have biological and chemical weapons. so their army is not being "executed" or something.

___________________
sempre contra a corrente do jogo

quote:

Originally posted by PaRaNoIk0 they are believed to have biological and chemical weapons. so their army is not being "executed" or something.

they were given those by the americans, germans and french way back in 89 to get rid of the Kurds.

and if they have developed any now, why havent they used them if they have weapons of mass destruction??


all the missiles lanched by Iraq were declared non scud missles by an army general this morning

___________________
www.elkdee.com
Soundcloud sampler: www.soundcloud.com/elkdee

bhaha get a grip.

the more weapons iraq has, the more people will die. on both sides. you should be thankful they dont have much.

___________________
The father made fetuses with flesh licking ladies / While you and your mother were asleep in the trailer park / Thunderous sparks from the dark of the stadiums / The music and medicine you needed for comforting / So make all your fat, fleshy fingers fingers to moving / And pluck all your silly strings and / Bend all your notes for me and / Soft silly music is meaningful, magical / The movements were beautiful / All in your ovaries / All of them milking with green fleshy flowers / While powerful pistons were sugary sweet machines, / Smelling of semen all under the garden / Was all you were needing when you still believed in me.

quote:

Originally posted by davinox bhaha get a grip. the more weapons iraq has, the more people will die. on both sides. you should be thankful they dont have much.

word.

it is ok to be against war, but wanting Iraq to win the war is dumb. (I'm not saying anyone here wants Iraq to win it)

___________________
sempre contra a corrente do jogo

oh dear.

someone wake him up, ur living in a dreamworld mate.

___________________

1. You've been accused of having weapons of mass destruction and you have denied having any of them. The UN has does a number of inspections, and you do not comply completely. (why? who knows).

2. The US declares war on you.

3. You continue telling your people and the world you have no (or no longer) have weapons of mass destruction, and that the US is a war mongering greedy bully and should be fought against.

Two choices.

A. Would it be wiser to use those weapons of mass destruction to defeat your enemy and become an official visible liar to the entire world? (meaning, the UN and nations would agree, that the US was correct, and possibly join in the conflict)

B. or would it be smarter to secretly destroy the weapons of mass destruction, and die with "dignity", knowing you possibly will never be proved of having such weapons, and in turn making the "war mongering bully" United States look like a fool to the entire world for being so sure of Iraq having such weapons.

The right answer is B.

By choosing A, he would prove the United States was correct, and I can assure you, several many more nations would jump in and support the take out. He would just be hurting himself.

War tactics man, war tactics.

quote:

Originally posted by PaRaNoIk0 word. it is ok to be against war, but wanting Iraq to win the war is dumb. (I'm not saying anyone here wants Iraq to win it)

believe me...i dont think Saddam is the greatest guy and want him to win...i just feel that knowing that Iraq is defenseless, America is using the most non combating methods and just destroying a city that has taken ages to be built...

___________________
www.elkdee.com
Soundcloud sampler: www.soundcloud.com/elkdee

quote:

Originally posted by SportTrance 1. You've been accused of having weapons of mass destruction and you have denied having any of them. The UN has does a number of inspections, and you do not comply completely. (why? who knows). 2. The US declares war on you. 3. You continue telling your people and the world you have no (or no longer) have weapons of mass destruction, and that the US is a war mongering greedy bully and should be fought against. Two choices. A. Would it be wiser to use those weapons of mass destruction to defeat your enemy and become an official visible liar to the entire world? (meaning, the UN and nations would agree, that the US was correct, and possibly join in the conflict) B. or would it be smarter to secretly destroy the weapons of mass destruction, and die with "dignity", knowing you possibly will never be proved of having such weapons, and in turn making the "war mongering bully" United States look like a fool to the entire world for being so sure of Iraq having such weapons. The right answer is B. By choosing A, he would prove the United States was correct, and I can assure you, several many more nations would jump in and support the take out. He would just be hurting himself. War tactics man, war tactics.

that actually makes sense....ill give u props for that

___________________
www.elkdee.com
Soundcloud sampler: www.soundcloud.com/elkdee

Isn't it funny how Bush says he's protecting THE WORLD one moment, and then says that all AMERICANS will be safe.

Good to know that the world consists of Americans being safe, and then everyone else...

___________________
______________________
<img src="images/advertisments/green_energy.jpg">

quote:

Originally posted by DJ El Kay Dee believe me...i dont think Saddam is the greatest guy and want him to win...i just feel that knowing that Iraq is defenseless, America is using the most non combating methods and just destroying a city that has taken ages to be built...

for fucks sake,wake up and smell reality!

They are not DESTROYING BAGHDAD. They are hitting targets relevant to the Iraqi war machine, and the evil regime that runs it.

They are using the methods of combat which ensure minimum loss of life, what the fuck are u talking bout 'non-combating'? do u think they are going to risk lives on purpose?

The tactics being used are aimed at one thing, finishing the war as soon as possible, which will mean less deaths all round.

Please, get a grip.

___________________

quote:

the coallition is only bombing from air to ground...and from sea to ground with cruise missles...do they have any balls to march in on foot and actually do anything???? just cos they know that Iraq cant defend itself against such a combat, it is being used...how can this be called fair??

dont you even think american/uk marines are marching towards baghdad AND encountering resistance?

u might have had a point is ur facts are right

-phase