|
| quote: | Originally posted by venomX
Very interesting, they do look like explosions, and they're preceding the collapse. Is there any way that the explosion like squibs could happen from the sheer pressure of the top collapsing on the rest of the building? |
Nothing personal, but I find it interesting how all the emerging evidence that fits with control demolition theory like a glove is desperately crammed in the pancake theory box, where much of it doesn't fit and keeps popping out.
[EDIT]
Some examples
Seismic evidence:
- spikes in seismographs preceding collapse of eigther tower
- difference of almost twice in total energy (hence potential energy) of two vitrually identical systems (Laws of Physics: Conservation of Energy & Potential Energy = Kinetic Energy). Obvious conclusion: Additional Kinetic Energy increasin Potential Energy in other collapse.
Witness testimony on explosions:
- by Firemen, Policemen, and civilians at the scene
- by WTC staff memebers of explosion in the basement preceding collapse
Rate of fall:
- far too short for pancake theory to be scientifically plausible. Only few second over free fall speed. Pancake theory would require atleast 45 seconds due to resistance to fall offered by each sussesive floor and law of conservation of momentum.
- Building 7 wasn't hit by a plane, have any significant fires, or significant damage. It fell down at virtually free fall speed. Inwards dip and collapses on it's footprint, signature controlled demolition.
Structural Integrity:
- fire has never caused a modern steelframed high rise to collapse (for an excellent example, check out Madrid Fire lasting almost a day)
- airplane crashes have never caused a modern steelframe highrise to collapse (B52 bomber, which has a few tousand KGs of explosives, in Empire State Building)
- Twin Towers designed to be able to withstand atleast one 707 hit, architects and engineers said it could easily withstand multiple hits as the structure was over engineered (which takes into account jet fuel btw)
Video Evidence:
- dust clouds shooting out of floors below collapsing towers
- dust clouds rising from bottom of tower before collapse
Molten Steel discovered eight weeks after collapse at ground zero
Typical control demolition features:
- taking out core structure by planting explosives in base of a structure (especially for larger and stronger structures)
- fast collapse speed and accelerated fall
- explosives need careful placement to ensure structure collapses on footprint
Thermite, Phosphorus, and Manganese found in samples of columns by BYU Physics PHD & Prof Steven Jones; Thermate (which can be made with the three) is a typical demolition explosive that easily cuts through structural steel
___________________
"The Greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." -Stephen Hawking
"First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me— and there was no one left to speak out for me." -Martin Niemöller
Last edited by shaolin_Z on Dec-05-2006 at 02:26
|
i like it how the fact that steven jones' research a) hasn't passed peer review and b) is rejected by the world's engineers isn't included in that story. what a load of crap.
.
