|
| quote: | Originally posted by The17sss
In the 90's, there were 6 or 8 teams at the bottom that were absolutely atrocious. We don't think about it because the teams at the top were so awesome.
I think the distribution today is better. Every major market has a good team at the same time: Boston, L.A., NY, Chicago, Dallas, Miami. There was a 10 year period when Boston and New York sucked huge balls, and the NBA was worse for it. |
No doubt there were bad teams in the 90s, but today the rising OKC, and the ones you mentioned are the only teams that are good. in the old days you had better teams everywhere....and with 1 or 2 stars with an amazing supporting cast
look at the pistons in 1990 (all 5 starters were great, had 1-2 big star, rest excellent supporting cast) for example, theres plenty more teams like that in that era...Sure there was teams like the Bucks, like today, couldnt string a 5 game winning streak lol.
I just find (and the heat are a perfect example of that) that teams today will grab 2-3 superstars, the rest shit ass players and go from there.
|