|
Although I'm on vacation, i just had to post here Sorry for the long post, but this thread is very interesting indeed.
| quote: | Originally posted by tiesto14
But when you really break it down...music is subjective...plain and simple... |
True. Music is as subjective as any other form of art (painting, cinema, writing ...) but keep in mind that it's got an origin (everything comes from something else) and an impact (what changes did that piece of art bring?). This is what we're discussing about here: what caused the birth of epic trance and what's its impact on the electronic music scene. I realise this is also subjective, but it's something that should be discussed in order to compare ideas and look for new ways to develop music (either if you're a musician or a critic).
| quote: | Originally posted by tiesto14
Like what you like....if it matters what the person next to you considers good, well then you are not listening for the right reasons... |
I think it's extremely important to check other peoples' point of view. Everybody's got a different point of view of life because we've all been through different experiences and often people see things we don't see. It's not a matter of changing your taste, but rather not being narrow-minded and trying to see things from another angle.
| quote: | Originally posted by YaleTrance
What I'm talking about is sociocultural values that people utilize when appreciating music. (...) These restricting concepts (strict notions of structure and tonality) are very Western and unlike most edm and pop music from contemporary times, it also causes the music to lack any funk or soul. |
Well, these restricting concepts are not particularly Western, but rather something that is part of any conservative group. That's how genres are born: first, there's an original genre. It's got its rules, structure and motifs. Then, a dissident group starts to change some aspects and slowly create a newer sound. Often, purists are against this new genre and the enthusiasts who created these modifications drift apart from their original genre, creating a new one, which explores these new characteristics that keep them together. This egocentric and megalomaniac attitude leads to an eventual saturation, which causes new dissidents to change whatever has been over-used and create yet another genre.
| quote: | Originally posted by YaleTrance
Have you ever been to Holland? Gouryella smells, tastes and looks Dutch in every possible way. The melody, the harmonic pattern, the structure, the bassline, the buildup, the breakdown: All the components of the track are based on a Dutch ethos in the context of globalization and European integration. | I'm sincerely interested in understanding more about it. I reckon that enviroment is essential for the creation of art, but being an outsider, there's no way I can understand it. Even though I live in a society that has been influenced by the Dutch invasions a long time ago (my accent still has traces from flemmish), and that is a blending of cultures all over the world (not only because of colonisation, but because we have a huge amount of foreigners in my city), I still find epic trance extremely Central-European, with its roots essentially linked to European classical music and German early trance.
| quote: | Originally posted by YaleTrance
I could really go into detail explaining how the process that led to what you now call epic or anthem or whatever is based on very Dutch ideals adapted from what they imported from Europe and the world (the universal mvt. spawned by Detroit-Chicago-acid house-UK's second summer of love-german trance-the goa influence etc) |
I'm looking forward to reading that 
(It's not in that article you wrote, in which you used my map, is it? It was an interesting piece of work, but since I read it a long time ago, I'm bound to forget things)
| quote: | Originally posted by YaleTrance
I always hated formulaic music, I never understood rock or pop |
Rock is not formulaic: although you have a wider range of opportunities with electronic music, it doesn't mean there's no evolution in music that don't use such features. Otherwise, why would rock have so many sub-genres?
Same for pop (which is often a form of electronic music, but with a different purpose), hip hop (which is yet another form of electronic music) and any other genre that doesn't need computers to exist.
| quote: | Originally posted by YaleTrance
I like a tastefully done breakdown like the one in Gouryella because it gives the music an extra edge in its linear development. I don't mind waiting for it because it is done with class and significant artistic value. Since my main concern is with music and not dancing, I don't have a problem with it taking so long. |
The problem with epic and anthem trance nowadays is that it's been raped by its own formula: the over-use of epic tracks in a live set led to a competition for what track would be reminded by listeners. This led to a megalomaniac and competitive behaviour from producers (Tijs included), while the goal of dancing music is making people dance (which seems to have been forgotten).
| quote: | Originally posted by colonelcrisp
electronic music is only about 20 years old |
No it's not. Study the history of electronic music and you'll find out it's older than you imagine. Even disco was created more than 20 years ago.
| quote: | Originally posted by colonelcrisp
Classics are and will always be personal to the individual |
Classics are not personal, but part of history. Dance2trance's "We come in Peace" is a classic, because it was a very important tune for the development of trance, and it will always be, you like it or not. System F's Exhale and Rank 1's Airwave are not: they didn't add anything to the history of electronic music, did they? Don't confuse classics with favourites...
I like Exhale, but I'm completely aware that it's no classic.
| quote: | Originally posted by paranoik0
I just didn't understand one thing: if they're all the same cheesy crap, why divide in two categories?
|
Because it's not about quality, but about characteristics. Epic trance is more laid back and anthem is more hands-in-the-air.
Simple, innit? That's why Ian Van Dahl's Castle in the Sky is epic trance too.
| quote: | Originally posted by whiskers
what do hippies have to do with goa being a bad genre? |
Ishkur seem to have skipped this one, so I'm hijacking the question 
Easily: elitism and the motifs. The music is great, but the "xamanism", as they call it, is unbearable. Music is not about fun anymore; it's something sacred that can't be mixed with anything else in order to keep its purity. I like goa trance, but being forced to listen to it for 3 days non-stop is bloody annoying (there are festivals that are this long, playing exclusively goa and psy trance).
The music is good though.
| quote: | Originally posted by Ishkur
There is nothing classy or artistic about epic trance. Something that has artistic value would have to be multi-dimensional, unique, and have an almost raw, genuine sensibility to it. By contrast, epic trance is none of these things. It is drab, one-dimensional, trite and, at times, insulting our intelligence |
The essence of it is classy. Within its concepts, it is artistic. You already know my opinion about it (that it's more about what has been done to the genre than what the genre really is) and my analogy to Parnassian (and we seem to agree), so it's a bit pointless to keep quoting you.
| quote: | Originally posted by Ishkur
Not that anyone left has any taste worth changing. |
One last thing: you can't change people's tastes, but you can show them your opinion, so they can agree or not You need to be subtle sometimes though, whenever their opinion is too strong and blinding them from seeing that there can be a different truth.
| quote: | Originally posted by Peter Campbell
I think trance needs to go back to 1995, back when it was real, cause today its just not "trance"  |
Although I got what you mean (and wholeheartedly agree), instead of going back to 1995, I'd rather say it's got to move on to 2003/2004, instead of being stuck in 1999.
| quote: | Originally posted by mezzir
 |
Stupidity is in the mind of the beholder: what seems stupid to you might not be as stupid as you think This thread would be stupid if it were a bunch of insults with no foundation.
| quote: | Originally posted by Trancegiant
Creativity within a clear formula/frame? |
Yes, there can be.
The purpose of art is to bring new ways to express yourself, always pushing the limits. There always is a way to develop things, even within the epic trance formula, but this is mainly a hit and miss thing. If today we think that it's miss, we should sit back and analyse what's gone wrong. Fix it and move on.
Honestly, I wish producers could see it rather than just keep changing melodies using the same formula. It's blatantly pointless to do something other people have already done. Obviously, everything comes from something else, but this is not an excuse to cease evolution.
Probably my longest post ever, but this is worth debating.
___________________
Indiana Clones Upcoming Sets
[ I May Upload Something Someday ]
Last edited by Lira on Nov-03-2003 at 22:33
|