quote:

Originally posted by djSlain about the 8000 pounds of moon rock. was that 8000 pounds in moon gravity or earth gravity. I would think it'd be way easy to lift off with that much weight, only to come crashing down into the ocean and unloaded for analysis

Roughly 800 pounds ... not 8000. This theory has some notable flaws with it. First, the rocks that reentered the atmosphere in this manner would exhibit the same scorching and oxidation inevitable from their re-entry to Earth through the atmosphere. This is not the case. Secondly, I posed the question before ... what advanced robotic probe possessed the capability of traversing the surface of the moon to acquire hundreds of pounds of samples whereas the Soviets could only acquire 300 grams?






Oh wait ... it's coming to me. They obviously utilized the advanced, anti-matter powered lunar surface traverser/rock collector/hoax enabler. Secret Nasa photo from a fearless whistleblower:





Notice it's complete lack of ANY shadows

___________________
Retro ...

Of course we haven't been to the moon...if we had, we would've met the mooninites by now.

___________________
Alcoholic Alliance
The Ecstasy (MDMA) Bible Thread 2.0

quote:

Originally posted by Masonious you win again dude - and nice move shoving the whole i figured out how to order pizza thing in my face. i tried that 4 and a half months ago and woke up with a Taiwanese transvestite but to Ygrene it's just, "anoother day in the life, noooo biggieee".

check this out :

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/video/moontruth.php

___________________

i thought the russians never made it.. that's what it said on pbs

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by whiskers check this out : http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/video/moontruth.php

who made that?

___________________

quote:

Originally posted by whiskers check this out : http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/video/moontruth.php

You mean this video?

http://www.moontruth.com/full.htm

___________________
Retro ...

quote:

Originally posted by occrider It's resolution can only make out the disturbances of the site, however, in the year 2005 when the Japanese Selene satellite orbits the moon to take extremely high resolution mapping scans, I will gladly resurrect this thread to laugh and point. http://www.isas.ac.jp/e/enterp/miss...elene/cont.html

quote:

Originally posted by Sunsnail

Um ok so they pushed back the launch date to 2007:

http://www.isas.ac.jp/e/enterp/miss...ene/index.shtml

Was there something substantial you wanted to say beyond the smiley?

___________________
Retro ...

quote:

Originally posted by occrider Um ok so they pushed back the launch date to 2007: http://www.isas.ac.jp/e/enterp/miss...ene/index.shtml Was there something substantial you wanted to say beyond the smiley?

Nope, was just wondering what happened

quote:

Originally posted by Unknown DJ i think ti was faked. i read that the area just outside the earths atmosphere is so radioactive, if anyone crossed it in a ship or not, they would die of cancer soon after.

You think it was faked because of some story you read? How do you know that radioactive atmosphere stuff isnt bs? What makes that more credible than the idea that man landed on the moon? It all just sh!t you see and hear and to me the moon landing is more credible so until it can be categorically proven to be otherwise (ie. someone proves they went into space and caught cancer because of it) ill continue to believe it.

___________________

quote:

That tranceaddict sure set me straight... when i said dj. sammy roxord he said "wtf? you n00b..."

The radiation was no enough to cause cancer.

___________________

Actual footage:

___________________