 |
|
|
|
 |
TechnoSpeed
Junior tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2004
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota
|
|
|
I see your points. Using the term "Techno to describe this genre is my way of explaining it to people who have no idea about any of the types of techno. I would not try to explain the differences and the styles to someone who does not know anything about the music. The word techno is obviously derived from technology, thus explaining all the maechanical-like sounds you can hear (lasers, beeps, etc). That is nowhere near the same as trance r any other style. So I would not say that it is an umbrella to call it all Techo, but it is much easier to just let people call it Techno and be done with it. I agree with DjDigDug, it is much harder to make a quality Techno sound without sound cheesy, like some kind of Nintendo game. The other styles seem to be able to flow and mix easier, but thenagain I am not a DJ so I am probably wrong about that.
___________________
Trance Forever.
Current Favorites
Deep Trance 27-Misja Helsloot
Trance 4 Mations 1 & 2
AVB-State of Trance 1-3
|
|
Aug-03-2004 14:20
|
|
|
 |
 |
Zayatz
commercial techno whOrE

Registered: Oct 2001
Location: Elva, Estonia
|
|
|
Aug-03-2004 18:23
|
|
|
 |
 |
Aquarian
king of no pants
Registered: May 2005
Location: Laval, Quebec
|
|
|
I've really tried liking techno, listened to sets, samples, reccomendations from other TAs. I had alot of patience trying to appreciate it, but in the end, I really really don't like it. I find it dull, without drive, repetitive and boring.
|
|
Mar-16-2006 13:59
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 17:54.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|