 |
zoogla
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
|
|
|
Sorry about the ridiculous amount of space between this text and the table below! I tried as much as I could to get rid of it but I couldn't!!!!
Anyway, I wanted to share some research with y'all. I found the Prelude's Torque:Weight ratio to be much better than the Civic's and thus the lower 0-60 time, and HP:Weight ratio is slightly better. I also included a few other of the cars we've been discussing.
One anomoly is the better HP:Weight ratio for the Celica GT-S (vs. Prelude) yet the manufacturer's 0-60 time is slower than the Prelude's. Wasn't sure if that was a mistake; the Lude is about 450 lbs. heavier!!
CAR |
HP |
TORQUE |
0-60 |
Curb Weight (lbs.) |
HP:Weight Ratio |
Torque:Weight Ratio |
Compression Ratio |
2005 WRX STi
|
300 |
300 |
5.1 |
3309 |
0.091 |
0.091 |
8.2 (max boost 14.5 psi) |
2005 S2000
|
240 |
162 |
6.3 |
2838 |
0.085 |
0.057 |
11.1 |
2005 TT
|
225 |
207 |
6.3 |
3223 |
0.070 |
0.064 |
9 |
2005 RX-8
|
238 |
159 |
6.8 |
3045 |
0.078 |
0.052 |
10 |
1997 Prelude
|
195 |
156 |
7 |
2948 |
0.066 |
0.053 |
10 |
2005 Celica GT-S
|
180 |
130 |
7.2 |
2497 |
0.072 |
0.052 |
11.5 |
2000 Civic SiR
|
160 |
111 |
7.2 |
2600 |
0.062 |
0.043 |
10.2 |
Last edited by on Apr-03-2005 at 06:29
|
|
Apr-03-2005 06:18
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
Tranceplanted
Senior tranceaddict
Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Toronto
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by fayraree
Sorry about the ridiculous amount of space between this text and the table below! I tried as much as I could to get rid of it but I couldn't!!!!
Anyway, I wanted to share some research with y'all. I found the Prelude's Torque:Weight ratio to be much better than the Civic's and thus the lower 0-60 time, and HP:Weight ratio is slightly better. I also included a few other of the cars we've been discussing.
One anomoly is the better HP:Weight ratio for the Celica GT-S (vs. Prelude) yet the manufacturer's 0-60 time is slower than the Prelude's. Wasn't sure if that was a mistake; the Lude is about 450 lbs. heavier!!
|
I think the Celica's slower 0-60 is because of it's lower torque/weight ratio. For quick acceleration, and in this case to only 60mph, the lower torque rating will hurt it more.
|
|
Apr-03-2005 09:27
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:10.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|