 |
|
|
|
 |
svens_bath
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Glasgow, UK
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by George Smiley
The solution to the asylum seeker "problem" is to let them work, simple as |
then you get the "they took our jobs" speil. anyway, thats another issue. all what im saying is that you would have less asylum seekers if there is no conflict back home...which can be influnced by a gov's foriegn policy. plus the reason for the islamic terrorist threat is beacsue of the way a country and its scoiety is represented on the world stage: the foreign policy..so it does matter.
|
|
May-05-2005 16:36
|
|
|
 |
 |
eLe_vatE
protected
Registered: Jan 2002
Location: tulse hell
|
|
|
ooooooo can't wait for the coverage to start later hehe, I'm pathetically excited about it.
I voted by post last week in my home constituency of Rushcliffe (basically South Nottinghamshire), since Manchester Central (where my uni halls are) is probably one of the safest Labour seat in the country so there seemed no point(68% of the vote in 2001, next was LD with 15%!!).
It was between Lid Dems and Conservatives for me, since socialism goes against alot of my ideas ruling Labour out. I thought that Id rather my parents were £4 a week better off as apposed to £8 a week worse off, so I voted Conservative (official stats from some think tank that worked this out from the partys' tax plans - published in The Times (I think) last week sometime) - I dont like the idea of my parents suffering finantially for not being fucking spongers. As if working families with children are not hit hard enough by the Labour Govt., the Lib Dems would turn the screw even more, I find that shocking to be perfectly honest.
It's a shame because the Lib Dems have a few good ideas, Im definitely with them on the environment, which is why Im pleased with my vote, because my MP is Kenneth Clarke (CON), who is a pretty liberal guy, a liberal guy with considerable influence as the ex-chancellor (92-97), sometimes I really wonder why hes in the conservative party hehe, so for me the vote is close to ideal, as Id probably feel more uneasy voting for a staunch right wing conservative.
|
|
May-05-2005 17:21
|
|
|
 |
 |
George Smiley
Supreme tranceaddict

Registered: Jan 2004
Location: 9 Bywater Street, Chelsea, London
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by eLe_vatE
ooooooo can't wait for the coverage to start later hehe, I'm pathetically excited about it.
I voted by post last week in my home constituency of Rushcliffe (basically South Nottinghamshire), since Manchester Central (where my uni halls are) is probably one of the safest Labour seat in the country so there seemed no point(68% of the vote in 2001, next was LD with 15%!!).
It was between Lid Dems and Conservatives for me, since socialism goes against alot of my ideas ruling Labour out. I thought that Id rather my parents were £4 a week better off as apposed to £8 a week worse off, so I voted Conservative (official stats from some think tank that worked this out from the partys' tax plans - published in The Times (I think) last week sometime) - I dont like the idea of my parents suffering finantially for not being fucking spongers. As if working families with children are not hit hard enough by the Labour Govt., the Lib Dems would turn the screw even more, I find that shocking to be perfectly honest.
It's a shame because the Lib Dems have a few good ideas, Im definitely with them on the environment, which is why Im pleased with my vote, because my MP is Kenneth Clarke (CON), who is a pretty liberal guy, a liberal guy with considerable influence as the ex-chancellor (92-97), sometimes I really wonder why hes in the conservative party hehe, so for me the vote is close to ideal, as Id probably feel more uneasy voting for a staunch right wing conservative. |
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!! Your not supposed to admit voting Tory!
|
|
May-05-2005 17:44
|
|
|
 |
 |
svens_bath
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Glasgow, UK
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by eLe_vatE
It was between Lid Dems and Conservatives for me, since socialism goes against alot of my ideas ruling Labour out. I thought that Id rather my parents were £4 a week better off as apposed to £8 a week worse off, so I voted Conservative (official stats from some think tank that worked this out from the partys' tax plans - published in The Times (I think) last week sometime) - I dont like the idea of my parents suffering finantially for not being fucking spongers. As if working families with children are not hit hard enough by the Labour Govt., the Lib Dems would turn the screw even more, I find that shocking to be perfectly honest.
|
the lib dems have pleged to give increased maternity pay to working families..hows that making it worse for them?
|
|
May-05-2005 17:48
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:41.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|