|
| quote: | Originally posted by djmetatron
there may be a few, but I think your in the minority here bud.
+ the ones u listed are TECHNO. What do they really have to offer as an opinion on Tiesto?
Techno is very differen't from Trance. I actually like Dave Clarke a lot as a producer, but he is too differen't from Tiesto to even mention in this debate, as well as the others u listed.
|
How does the music they are associated with make any difference? You said it was the people who have:
| quote: |
your own record label and have years of production under your belt. |
The people I mentioned qualify for that. Also, several of the techno DJs nowadays used to be trance producers/DJs in the past.
| quote: |
as if you know what they are really thinking.. |
What does that have to do with anything? I know for a fact that people have gotten their words twisted and bent to insane proportions by tabloids like Mixmag. Danny Tenaglia had to write to the reader column himself to make clear that there were lots of things he never said or that were just plain wrong. That was my point.
| quote: | Originally posted by tiestoisgod
That is true it would be stupid of them to do that, but how can you back up your previous statement? Not having a dig at you man but thats a statement you need a bit of solid copy behind. |
I could dig up some, but I really don't see the need when they've stated stuff like "trance is for plebs and nonces" (Dave Clarke) and "Thanks to anti-trance.com for fighting against trance's continuing foothold in the US clubscene" (Richie Hawtin). You do the math.
___________________
"Wenn du dich zum Untergrund zählst, reicht es nicht, es nur zu sagen. Du musst auch viel graben, um es zu werden."
|