|
| quote: | Originally posted by nacarter
Just to add something to this discussion, I think there are many people in here (myself included) that can attest to shady goings-on at several clubs in Toronto. As a sex trade researcher, I had several girls tell me of a number of prostitutes and pimps working out of The Guv targetting tourists. I dismissed this as 'word on the street' until I was propositioned at the Marco V show in February. The girl wanted $300 for an hour (definitely targetting high-rolling gino tourists). As I researched a little further, I found out that management is well aware of this situation and tolerates it. Hearsay and rumour? Hardly. The reputation of The Guv was good enough to make the World Sex Guide, a largely reliable source on the international sex trade.
The point of this little story. If there is pretty strong indications of one type of shady activity being allowed at a club, it is not libelous to suggest that a similar activity is also occuring (in this case, waving dealers or armed patrons into the club).
Does this damage the club's reputation? Considering that some European and American clubs are famous for their shady reputations and have suffered no loss in patronage, arguing harm is very difficult.
The reality for Joe Clubber is to understand that ANY club can be potentially dangerous and that nobody should be getting so drunk/high that they are no longer aware of their surroundings. |
Ahh thought i was the only one that was aware of www.worldsexguide.info (formerly www.wsgforum.com). I am also aware of the exact post in this forum that points out some guy picking up some chinese girls for money in a certain Toronto club.
However, I must disagree with you on the danger aspect. I think the Guvernment, given the large number of people, as well as the other EDM clubs in Toronto have a stellar safety record. Check records for police calls from the Guvernment or Boa's and compare that to the record for police calls to various hip hop nights. I do not see a correlation between sex trade activity and violence inside clubs. Outside clubs, I cannot speak for.
While communicating in the public domain for the purpose of prostitution is illegal in Canada, outcalls themselves are not illegal. In this sense, I do not believe clubs have a legal basis for refusing entry of such patrons into the club because a) the club itself can argue that the club grounds are in the private domain and not in the public domain and b) the club is not acting as an incall, that is clients do not come there to have sexual relation with patrons in that location. They leave the club for such activity thus the prostitute goes to the client not the other way around- more like an outcall than an incall.
If I were a club owner, I think I'd save myself the trouble and legal hastle and let these people in. This in no way, however, relieves me from obligations to search for weapons and drugs.
I also must disagree about your comment regarding clubs in America not suffering in the number of patrons due to a clubs reputation for being shady. If you take a look at NYC or Chicago in 2000 compared to now, things have changed dramatically. Clubs have been shut down by authorities, thus it has affected the number of patrons. Some have reopened and cleaned up their act to some degree, but its nothing like the pre-Gulianni era.
|