|
| quote: | Originally posted by MarkT
to be fair, many will argue that the U.S.S.R. was not even an example of true socialism...pure socialism has also arguably not existed anywhere on earth at any point in recent history.
having said that...the question then becomes, is *pure* socialism even possible, given the seemingly inevitable corruption and inefficiencies that result, by human nature. |
"Pure" socialism in terms of what you're referring to can never exist because people aren't altruistic by nature. People are self-interested. However, that isn't something that can be controlled - the USSR was as close to pure Socialism as can actually be regulated, and it and all the various other Communists experiments in Europe have all failed.
In theory, there is no difference between what happens in practice and what happens in theory. In practice, there is.
Government is by definition a bureaucracy, and bureaucracies may be efficient in theory but everyone who has ever dealt with Bell knows that they are very inefficient in practice. The more services you delegate to the government, the more inefficient they become and the more they cost... eventually, in a purely Socialist society, those costs will overwhelm society's net productivity and it will go into heavy debt, and subsequently die. That's what's happened with every Socialist experiment so far!
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|