It's all good! I didn't mean to rain on the parade and I'm sure there's plenty of consolation to be found in the more prominent praise for your set.
quote:
this music is mostly about the sound, not the melody or harmony or something like that. if i want that I listen to debussy or miles davis. i pick tracks because to me the sounds are lush, hypnotic, and therapeutic. it's a very different kind of appreciation of music
Then that is probably why it isn't my cup of tea. ...I'm strictly into melodic music with a pattern...this is one of the main characteristics that brought me to love trance in the first place (such a contrast from so much rubbish out there)....if I want to hear noise I usually just mow my lawn.
quote:
i'm just doing what i love.
And that is what's important!
Last edited by chadi on Jul-26-2007 at 02:10
Jul-26-2007 02:02
Allied Nations
Make it happen cap'n
Registered: Mar 2004
Location: MTHELL
this sort of talk deserves a thread in the MD...
___________________
Fortuna Favet Fortibus.
Jul-26-2007 02:03
nefardec
Tranceaddict in tranning
Registered: Oct 2004
Location:
agreed
Jul-26-2007 02:04
UWM
mandroid
Registered: Mar 2001
Location: Here
I'm not quite sure how one can criticize another person's subjective tastes on what they do and don't find appealing in a particular medium of art and subsequently attempt to articulate why what they listen to is 'right'.
Jul-26-2007 04:06
skip
a.k.a. skip2
Registered: Sep 2002
Location: home or somewhere else
i listened to this yesterday at work and again today (because i ran out of new stuff on my mp3 player and your set was the best one in the player)
anyway, i really liked it. mixing was brilliant and smooth as fuck.
the tunes weren't really something i'd see myself buying, but i really enjoyed them nonetheless and i felt that the mixing made this mix more than a sum of its parts.
dunno if i felt anything tantric though, just good music.
thanks, i'm flattered that you said that about more than a sum of its parts, because my belief is that unless you can put yourself into a collection of other people's music, you're not deejaying.
I agree that it's not as tantric as I originally had wanted it to be when I decided I was going to call the next mix "tantra". Like I mentioned in the original post, I kept hearing new stuff while I was compiling tracks and the sound changed a lot.
The tantric idea was to draw out the tracks as much as possible into a long stream of rising energy which culminates at last with a track like Diabla. When people ask me about deejaying I usually explain it as a sort of tantric exercise where you are constantly playing a game of teasing people with sounds and rhythms, holding back from playing the biggest tracks until the crowd absolutely can't take it anymore. I generally find that to be more rewarding for instance than getting a cheap rise out of people for playing big tracks early and having a couple guys pat you on the back.
so i tried to do that basically in this mix, whether or not it was how you heard it is another matter
Aug-19-2007 12:57
Pinokio
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Oct 2002
Location: Panama City, Panama
Sir you are fancy at mixing!
I kept more interested in listening to your mixing/transitions than the songs themselves.
I love your harmonic way of transitions songs, and the mix is definitely Journeyful.
It's true I love mixing and this mix and the one i posted more recently have two tracks playing together nearly all of the time.
Aug-19-2007 20:53
coded audio
chill connoisseur
Registered: Aug 2005
Location: Gold Coast , Australia
quote:
Originally posted by chadi
I'm strictly into melodic music with a pattern...this is one of the main characteristics that brought me to love trance in the first place (such a contrast from so much rubbish out there)....if I want to hear noise I usually just mow my lawn.
But that is the problem with trance. It has been the same noises with the same pattern for 15 years now.