|
| quote: | Originally posted by raveed
I think the DJ mag rankings make perfect sense. By top 100 they dont mean who is the most technically gifted dj but who is the DJ that more people will PAY to see....
it really doesnt matter if say for example eddie halliwell is a better mixer/dj than armin .. end of the day like any other profession the focus is on money and if armin can attract bigger crowds than eddie can, he clearly is number 1.. maybe not in the minds of people who understand the technical attributes that make a dj but try arguing with a majority who really dont know how well he is mixing ...its like comparing an independent film to a blockbuster Cameron movie
u actually think james zabiela in concert would be a bigger sellout than tiesto or armin in concert?? ofcourse not ... now stop cribbing that your favorite dj didnt make the top 10 and what a joke this list is.. atleast you have more dancing space in the club when he/she is spinning .. |
The dj mag is a fuckin joke. The only people who vote in this kind of polls are people who live either deep in North American south (red states) who only listen to cheesy trance, or the stupid meat-head scene of londoners.
Oh and by the way I've never heard of Ass-shit, um, i meant Ashtrix.
Ask people like Ricardo Villalobos or Matthew Dear about Dj Mag's top 100 and they will laugh their asses off. Why? because they don't need a stupid mag to pack the Panorama Bar or the Robert Johnson. The only people who benefit from this poll are trance-crackers like Christopher Lawrence, who sucks IMHO and needs this to sell his image and actually make a living.
Last edited by winston on Oct-24-2007 at 02:33
|
at them advertising it now as "the most popular DJ in the world".
