|
| quote: | Originally posted by Skipper
I would suggest doing an RFP to invite bids and strategies from various private companies that would come in to manage the system, but not own it outright. Then one of them would be selected to proceed. |
Government RFCs/RFPs are always a joke. By the time anybody actually gets to comment/propose, the contract has been awarded and the rest is just a formality. And the contracts always go to the most gigantic, inefficient, incompetent corporation; in the case of IT it's Accenture or IBM, I don't know who the players would be in this case.
Just look at how the roads are maintained in Toronto and Ontario. Same deal - let a bunch of people bid on the contract. All of them know that the contract is a cash cow and milk it for all it's worth, giving it the lowest possible priority amongst all their contracts and doing a half-assed job in general.
If you want the system to work, you need actual accountability. The pseudo-private government contracts you're suggesting don't actually provide that, which is why they never work in practice.
What exactly makes you think that transit would either need to be highly regulated OR a planning nightmare? It's very common across the U.S. and it works fine there. And you even have mostly-private, slightly-subsidized companies like GO here that run far more efficiently than the TTC.
___________________
My party schedule:
2009-02-21 - DJ Attention @ I'm So Popular
2009-06-18 - DJ Annoying @ People Need To Know Where I'll Be
2012-11-32 - DJ Insufferable ɸ Or At Least the Stalkers I Complain About
2048-06-66 - Spastic & Whocares ¶ Although I'm Actually Flattered
9999-45-81 - Tweaker Gimp ☼ I Probably Won't Even Go To This But I Have To Make Sure I Fill Up All The Available Space Here
|