Become a part of the TranceAddict community!Frequently Asked Questions - Please read this if you haven'tSearch the forums
TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Music Discussion > Trance now vs. Trance then (pre 1995)
Pages (11): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Share
Author
Thread    Post A Reply
RebeL9
The Digital Blonde addict



Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

quote:
Originally posted by Spirit5
I've already said I don't mean to imply that, I mean to imply those who feel like they've been there because they feel back then it was so much better..but my question is..have they actually experienced something or are they just basing it off of what others have told them? Maybe you need to read my later posts on this thread to understand.


no you should start to read the posts because a few have already answered that indeed you may have started listening to trance recently but still be able to pick up an oldie from 1993 and enjoy it just as much as if it was picked up back when it was released.
Why do you insist on that people here are lying about what they actually feel about the music? Why would they base it on what others have told them? That is ridicilous.


___________________
My new oldskool TRANCE mix!

Old Post Nov-30-2007 21:21  Afghanistan
Click Here to See the Profile for RebeL9 Click here to Send RebeL9 a Private Message Visit RebeL9's homepage! Add RebeL9 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
SMC
custom title addict



Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Sweden

quote:
Originally posted by Spirit5
Because I have posted on this forum for two years and have yet to really enjoy the discussion because it almost always turns into arguments about whose trance is better, what is REAL trance, whose music sucks...etc etc etc. It's not about my problems, it's about my problem with this forum and these threads that always turn into the same old "those were the glory days, nothing else comes close!" like those feelings are shared throughout..by everyone and I am in the minority when there's plenty of people who like the same stuff. So why can't we just discuss it without arguing? And my beef with TA is because it's a misleading title for a forum where only those who have a certain mindset or certain style they like..are accepted.

Like trance? There's going to be people on here who don't like trance. Don't like trance? There's going to be people on here who like trance. And the elitists...well they speak as if they speak for everybody and bash those who might like something different or think differently or approach the music differently or whatnot...I came on this forum hoping to talk to others who liked the same type of music, but I find it's not really so much about the music I like.


Well, what the hell is it you wanna discuss if you're so uncomfortable with people having opinions different from yours?

This is an appreciation/"what if?"/hypothetical bs/whatever thread about early trance. You're the one coming in here doing the arguing, writing a shitload of text trying to find some stupid reason why it's supposedly "silly" to like early trance.

Old Post Nov-30-2007 21:28 
Click Here to See the Profile for SMC Click here to Send SMC a Private Message Add SMC to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Spirit5
Nobody



Registered: Jun 2005
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by RebeL9
no you should start to read the posts because a few have already answered that indeed you may have started listening to trance recently but still be able to pick up an oldie from 1993 and enjoy it just as much as if it was picked up back when it was released.
Why do you insist on that people here are lying about what they actually feel about the music? Why would they base it on what others have told them? That is ridicilous.


I don't think they are lying, I think they are rather so focused on this old stuff and ignore new stuff like trance is dead and this old stuff was so much better or different. Or that this stuff was the only REAL trance. That's what I am against, not liking older music, I like this older stuff too. And I appreciate people exposing me and others to it. Or that every track having a 3 minute breakdown....that's equally not true like assumptions I have made. Not every new track released has a "3 minute breakdown" or "super-saws" or any of that crap.

Old Post Nov-30-2007 21:28  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Spirit5 Click here to Send Spirit5 a Private Message Add Spirit5 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Spirit5
Nobody



Registered: Jun 2005
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by SMC
Well, what the hell is it you wanna discuss if you're so uncomfortable with people having opinions different from yours?

This is appreciation/"what if?"/hypothetical bs/whatever thread about early trance. You're the one coming in here doing the arguing, writing a shitload of text trying to find some stupid reason why it's supposedly "silly" to like early trance.


I don't mind people having different opinions, but when there's theads with people wanting to discuss new trance, they should be able to just as much as old trance. That's not letting others have different opinions either, because some people might like ASOT, Armin or the new stuff. I like early trance, I'm not trying to imply it sucks.

Old Post Nov-30-2007 21:30  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Spirit5 Click here to Send Spirit5 a Private Message Add Spirit5 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
RebeL9
The Digital Blonde addict



Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

quote:
Originally posted by Spirit5
I don't think they are lying, I think they are rather so focused on this old stuff and ignore new stuff like trance is dead and this old stuff was so much better or different. Or that this stuff was the only REAL trance. That's what I am against, not liking older music, I like this older stuff too. And I appreciate people exposing me and others to it. Or that every track having a 3 minute breakdown....that's equally not true like assumptions I have made. Not every new track released has a "3 minute breakdown" or "super-saws" or any of that crap.


have it ever crossed your mind that they maybe enjoy the older stuff more than the new stuff without hating the new stuff? I mean sure there are a few good trance releases but damn are they few nowadays. It's even rarer than a few years ago.
I don't hate new trance. I just feel there are way too few new releases to make the scene any exciting.


___________________
My new oldskool TRANCE mix!

Old Post Nov-30-2007 21:32  Afghanistan
Click Here to See the Profile for RebeL9 Click here to Send RebeL9 a Private Message Visit RebeL9's homepage! Add RebeL9 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Spirit5
Nobody



Registered: Jun 2005
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by RebeL9
have it ever crossed your mind that they maybe enjoy the older stuff more than the new stuff without hating the new stuff? I mean sure there are a few good trance releases but damn are they few nowadays. It's even rarer than a few years ago.
I don't hate new trance. I just feel there are way too few new releases to make the scene any exciting.


Then we need better producers then who can make good trance. But glamorizing in the old isn't going to somehow make things better in the new. We can learn from the old, but focusing on the past so much I feel ignores some of the newer releases which might be worth considering.

Old Post Nov-30-2007 21:35  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Spirit5 Click here to Send Spirit5 a Private Message Add Spirit5 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
SMC
custom title addict



Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Sweden

quote:
Originally posted by Spirit5
I don't mind people having different opinions, but when there's theads with people wanting to discuss new trance, they should be able to just as much as old trance. That's not letting others have different opinions either, because some people might like ASOT, Armin or the new stuff. I like early trance, I'm not trying to imply it sucks.


No one has prevented anyone from having a certain opinion. This is a message board where we exchange opinions, that's how it works.

Old Post Nov-30-2007 21:36 
Click Here to See the Profile for SMC Click here to Send SMC a Private Message Add SMC to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
SMC
custom title addict



Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Sweden

quote:
Originally posted by Spirit5
but focusing on the past so much I feel ignores some of the newer releases which might be worth considering.


Which releases exactly are we ignoring?

Old Post Nov-30-2007 21:38 
Click Here to See the Profile for SMC Click here to Send SMC a Private Message Add SMC to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
Spirit5
Nobody



Registered: Jun 2005
Location:

quote:
Originally posted by SMC
Which releases exactly are we ignoring?


C-Quence - Impossible, Make Your Own Choice
Bissen - Exhale, Quicksand
Solar Energy - White Moon
Valve - Melancholy
Santiago Nino & Damien Heck - Red Sky (Dunderstadt Dub)
Maor Levi - Shapes (Oliver Smith Remix)
Mike Mikhajan & Mike Saint Jules - Bay Breeze
Kamil Polner - Crystal Heaven
Thomas Datt - Distance
Nick Murray - Illusion
Toby Skark - Prolight (Planisphere Remix)
Joost Van Der Vleuten - Broken Dreams
Mikka Kuisisma's entire new album (okay not ignoring, but still a great album that I agree with)

many more...

Last edited by Spirit5 on Nov-30-2007 at 22:01

Old Post Nov-30-2007 21:53  United States
Click Here to See the Profile for Spirit5 Click here to Send Spirit5 a Private Message Add Spirit5 to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
nefardec
Tranceaddict in tranning



Registered: Oct 2004
Location:

i v'e got to be honest

i considered those newer releases, and they didn't cut it for me



mainly the problems were:

- too samey amongst each other
- they seem to take themselves too seriously
- unoriginal, predictable concepts of melody and phrasing
- very unoriginal in terms of sound design (if you would have asked me when they were made I would have said 2002)



i'm not really into trance anymore these days but I can tell you what kinds of things you might know that I do like so you get an idea: (and these aren't even old school)


Steve Birch - Spaced Out
Steve Birch - Lost Forever
Space Manoevers - Stage One (Separation Mix)
Der Dritte Raum - Hale Bopp (Raumgleitersversion)
Valentino - Flying (Sultan & Tonedepth Remix)
Joker Jam - Innocence
Orbital - Halcyon
Orbital - Belfast
Haak - Bass Shuttle
Humate - 3.1 (Mijk Van Dijk Remix)
Conscious - Northern Lights (POB Remix)
V-One - Dead Cities
Lange - New Life
Paragliders - Lithium
Paragliders - Paraglide (humate's 98 mix)
Paragliders - Infra Rouge
Moogwai - Nord Song
Xian - Pachinko (Chab Dub)
Airwave - Ladyblue (1992 Flight) (pretty much any mix)
Armin van Buuren - Blue Fear
Oliver Lieb - Subraumstimulation (Sander Kleinenberg Remix)
Schiller - Das Glockenspiel (and humate remix)
Paul Van Dyk - Connected (Motomix 05)
Kamaya Painters - Summerbreeze
pretty much anything by Oliver Lieb, Art Of Trance, mwnn

other things like this

Old Post Nov-30-2007 23:34 
Click Here to See the Profile for nefardec Click here to Send nefardec a Private Message Add nefardec to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
HaeD
Tranceaddict



Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Montreal

there were no competition in that time. I believe that is what killed the scene. Now there is 2 many perfect dj.


___________________
- What is left of us -

Old Post Nov-30-2007 23:55  Canada
Click Here to See the Profile for HaeD Click here to Send HaeD a Private Message Add HaeD to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message
noikeee
dubstep convert



Registered: Apr 2002
Location: lost and wandering looking for directions.
Re: Re: Re: Trance now vs. Trance then (pre 1995)

quote:
Originally posted by eRRaTiK
That's assuming that they even knew what that music was. What if it were completely new to them? Now that would make it interesting.


It simply sounds dated, there's too many details that would make anyone immediately associate it with oldschool wannabe "rave", ie, 1 or 2 tracks with hoovers and chipmunk vocals, vocals samples with chicks saying senseless futuristic bullshit like "embrace yourself out there in space", etc. A mainstream crowd would never get it, and an EDM-knowledgable crowd would immediately identify it as dated and uncool.

Doesn't impede it from being totally fucking awesome music.


___________________
sempre contra a corrente do jogo

Old Post Nov-30-2007 23:58  Portugal
Click Here to See the Profile for noikeee Click here to Send noikeee a Private Message Visit noikeee's homepage! Add noikeee to your buddy list Report this Post Reply w/Quote Edit/Delete Message

TranceAddict Forums > Main Forums > Music Discussion > Trance now vs. Trance then (pre 1995)
Post New Thread    Post A Reply

Pages (11): « 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 »  
Last Thread   Next Thread
Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackKiller track sounds similar to Klaas style [2008] [1]

Click here to listen to the sample!Pause playbackTony Allen - "Take Me Higher" (Paul van Dyk Rework) [2003]

Show Printable Version | Subscribe to this Thread
Forum Jump:

All times are GMT. The time now is 18:57.

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
Search this Thread:

 
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict

Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
Support TA!