 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
Trancer-X
mutatis mutandis

Registered: Jul 2001
Location: Shambhala
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Smells Like Socialist Spirit
| quote: | Originally posted by colonelcrisp
Let me put this into a nice analogy.
I'm an engineer, with benefits, overtime and expenses, i make around 95-100K per year CDN$. I pay a shit load of taxes, but that doesnt bother me at all, i still have loads of money kicking around to pay down debt, pay for my living expenses, save for a rainy day and blow on stupid things.
The reason im not pissed about it is because when i got to mcdonalds, there is some shmuck there to serve me my fries, when i take my trash out in the morning, there is some guy that comes by in a truck to pick up my trash. There are hundreds of jobs that i would never want to do myself.
People who work these jobs (minimum wage, shit jobs) need some kind of incentive to keep doing it. Not everyone is intelligent enough to do what i do, or be a doctor, or lawyer etc. I think it is socially responsible to make sure that our tax system allows these people to maintain a good standard of living while providing a service. Just because im make a good salary doesnt mean i deserve to be pushed to the front of the line at the hospital, nor does it mean that my kids should get first pick of schooling etc. education and healthcare are the two great equalizers in society. If you're well educated and healthy, your are on equal footing with everyone else weather you came with a silver spoon shoved up your ass or you came from nothing.
I dont mind paying extra in tax to make sure people get fair and equal access to a good education and health care. |
What's so wrong with altruism? You know, giving to charities and other organiztions that support the needy. Why shoud we all be mandated to give up what we have when it should be done according to our own free will?
If we could all learn to be a little less materialistic and a whole lot less selfish then this world would definitely be a much better place for everyone. If we could learn to do that then perhaps people might begin to be judged by the content of their character rather than the size of their wallets (like the way things are now.)
Of course our media, the advertising industry, and sports and entertainment industries play a big role in perpetuating our culture of greedy consumption but over time I think that trend could easily be reversed if people began to question it. But that's a different topic altogether.
|
|
Oct-27-2008 21:57
|
|
|
 |
 |
colonelcrisp
Isn't Batshit Crazy

Registered: Apr 2003
Location: Ottawa
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Fir3start3r
What's desparately needed is non-partisan, basic, personal financial education.
How to budget, how to handle money, what is money, etc., etc. |
In the words of the great Ron White.....
You can't fix stupid
___________________
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
I have 3 hobbies: gaming, DJing & correcting maladjusted fools on the internet. |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
Yeah, I’d like to know what horrible, scarring incident in your childhood turned you into such an ignorant, intellectual-hating philistine? |
|
|
Oct-27-2008 21:57
|
|
|
 |
 |
jerZ07002
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2006
Location:
|
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Smells Like Socialist Spirit
| quote: | Originally posted by colonelcrisp
Let me put this into a nice analogy.
I'm an engineer, with benefits, overtime and expenses, i make around 95-100K per year CDN$. I pay a shit load of taxes, but that doesnt bother me at all, i still have loads of money kicking around to pay down debt, pay for my living expenses, save for a rainy day and blow on stupid things.
The reason im not pissed about it is because when i got to mcdonalds, there is some shmuck there to serve me my fries, when i take my trash out in the morning, there is some guy that comes by in a truck to pick up my trash. There are hundreds of jobs that i would never want to do myself.
People who work these jobs (minimum wage, shit jobs) need some kind of incentive to keep doing it. Not everyone is intelligent enough to do what i do, or be a doctor, or lawyer etc. I think it is socially responsible to make sure that our tax system allows these people to maintain a good standard of living while providing a service. Just because im make a good salary doesnt mean i deserve to be pushed to the front of the line at the hospital, nor does it mean that my kids should get first pick of schooling etc. education and healthcare are the two great equalizers in society. If you're well educated and healthy, your are on equal footing with everyone else weather you came with a silver spoon shoved up your ass or you came from nothing.
I dont mind paying extra in tax to make sure people get fair and equal access to a good education and health care. |
+1
i make more than that in USD (i pay more than USD 35K a year in taxes) and i'm happy to bear a greater burden if it means all will be better. i'm not for free give-aways, but health and education are not give aways. Also, providing better access to education and health care will ultimately result in less crime in american cities, something we all want. So much crime in the US is a result of poverty, which is a result of poor access to education and health care.
|
|
Oct-27-2008 22:01
|
|
|
 |
 |
jerZ07002
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2006
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Shakka
I think lower taxes for everyone is better. If the government can't function on what it brings in, then the government needs to shrink. I have my own obligations and ambitions and I don't need some twit from across the pond telling me to what degree I'm "rich" or "greedy" or am not paying my "fair" share. |
that begs the question of how much does the government need to function properly. you're assuming that the current income is an amount sufficient to run government. Shouldn't the amount necessary to fund government be determined before the proper tax allocation? It makes no sense to limit necessary government functions by some arbitrary tax income that you say is proper. If tax income was determined prior to the cost of necessary government expenditures then it is likely that there would be a shortfall because the nature of government is to match income with expense.
Last edited by jerZ07002 on Oct-27-2008 at 22:44
|
|
Oct-27-2008 22:38
|
|
|
 |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:24.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|