|
| quote: | Originally posted by haqq
Actually your just sick and tired of people having opposing viewpoint. |
wrong. i love the opposing viewpoints, and its pretty much the only reason i come to the PDD. juvenile understanding of politics however annoys the crap out of me. not to mention the disingenuous and dishonest conduct that normally goes hand in hand with it.
| quote: | Originally posted by haqq
Grow up |
this would have more impact if you didn't seriously think that the US invaded afghanistan for the opium. im still laughing about that.
| quote: | Originally posted by haqq
in this world we do have the internet meaning we don't need to live like sheep's and do some research instead of just watching bullshit portrayed over the media. |
so why dont you use it properly? with all this knowledge at your fingertips why are you trying to tell us the holocaust has been exaggerated 1000%, that the US/israel was behind 911, and there was opium conspiracy behind afghanistan? you're actually insulting this wonderful tool of knowledge.
| quote: | Originally posted by haqq
The Fox news statement I said was more a figure of speech. Just because people hear something out-of-ordinary something that hasn't been given media time they disregard it as being false. |
but that's where you're wrong. we disregard it because its blatant nonsense and just doesn't pass the logic test. most of us don't need to be "told" by the media that something is clearly bullshit.
| quote: | Originally posted by haqq
I have the feeling as though before I started posting id PDD everyone agreed with everything for the fear of getting a negative impression from the members. |
you're talking as if your opinions i have mentioned above hold some validity or deserve careful consideration. they don't.
| quote: | Originally posted by haqq
pkc you constantly bring in your emotions within debates thus blinding your path to view both sides. |
then stop wasting your brain away with nonsense conspiracy and turn it towards something meaningful, interesting and worthy of debate. ie, there is no debate. its called denialism.
| quote: |
Denialism: the employment of rhetorical tactics to give the appearance of argument or legitimate debate, when in actuality there is none. These false arguments are used when one has few or no facts to support one's viewpoint against a scientific consensus or against overwhelming evidence to the contrary. They are effective in distracting from actual useful debate using emotionally appealing, but ultimately empty and illogical assertions.
Examples of common topics in which Denialists employ their tactics include: Creationism/Intelligent Design, Global Warming Denialism, Holocaust Denial, HIV/AIDS Denialism, 9/11 conspiracies, tobacco carcinogenecity denialism (the first organized corporate campaign), anti-vaccination/mercury autism denialism and anti-animal testing/animal rights extremist denialism. Denialism spans the ideological spectrum, and is about tactics rather than politics or partisanship.
We believe there are five simple guidelines for identifying denialist arguments. Most denialist arguments will incorporate more than one of the following tactics: Conspiracy, Selectivity, False Experts, Impossible Expectations/Moving Goalposts, and Argument from Metaphor/violations of informal logic. |
___________________
|