|
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
It's all right, it's a welcome twist 
Actually, that isn't so. There have been many attempts to find proofs that the parting of the red sea, for instance, made sense. I heard that, specially in the XIX century, it was common to look for rational explanations for biblical stories - and, it turns out the parting of the Red Sea may have been a ludicrously exaggerated account of something that may have indeed happened thanks to the low tide in the said sea during a certain time of the year that matches the probable day of the event.
|
sure, 1800s but now? Remember we have progressed significantly in science and thought since that time. Especially with space travel, genetics, and our ideas on evolution. Its obvious that those explanations are outdated. I am not saying that everything we know is correct and nonfalsifiable. But simply with our senses and preception of things they seem to make more sense. Relgion is simply an evolution of myth. Myths are not reality as we perceive through our senses.
| quote: |
Wait, there's something wrong with the way you numbered these examples. In the first example, the former is correct and the latter is false. The same applies to the second example. Without any concrete facts, these sentences are indeed similar.
|
not really
myths are myths they are both not real.. hence the 1 1. In essence none can be correct since none are true or hold empirical weight.
saying a myth is correct is essentially an oxymoron. Otherwise we would call it a truth. No?
|