|
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
You don't need to understand it .. thats my point. I would say a good 50 % of people who believe in evolution don't actually understand how it works and are in awe when missing links are discovered lol. Does that make them smarter with regards to creation compared to the average religious idiot? Of course. They are simply looking at the statistical facts and concensus of the scientific community. You don't need to understand the structural engineering and integrity of the concrete in an appartment building to live in one. Don't you see how silly your argument is?
You are trying to make a comparison of fairy tales to science (Theories represented by continuous experiements and statistical probability of proven outcome.)
The way our society and civilization has developed isn't because everyone knows everything about everything. We have people who specialize in certain things and are certified and recognized by that community.
I am definatley not debating the nature of science. But one can obviously take its side without understanding even the basics. If you wish to understand the theories by all means go ahead. Sure the big bang can be disproven, why not. But the facts are that genesis and most religious doctrines are all fable so they can be readily dismissed without a doubt. Do you have doubts about the big bang? sure many of us do. But to proclaim that this is a plausable idea without understanding it would still be acceptable rather then saying god miraculously made everything in 7 days. Why? Because you have an understanding that science has taken us thus far and the scientific community has come to the concensus that this is a probable theory for creation.
Fine ill give you that. But its not similar to saying that god created the earth in 7 days and jesus was his son who walked on water.
Theory with some testable hypothesis and observation compared to pure FABLE
I'll let you do the math Einstein. |
i'm talking about lay-scientists, not people who go to a drs office if they're sick! you're analogy about the person using concrete but not knowing how it's made is not the same.
i'm saying it's more like a person with no experience building his own house, thinking that, since he's seen concrete before he can use it. THAT is what you're doing saying darwinian theory is true if you have no idea why.
i'm not saying it's not true, but i'm saying i wouldn't be boasting about something i didn't understand. A lot of people do, and make themselves look extremely stupid doing so (unless they're talking to similarly clueless people, in which case it's just another load of hypocritical n00bs chatting each other up).
once again, i'm not defending religion, so i have no idea at all why you keep bringing up the comparison as if i'm defending it 
science IS fairytales unless you know what you're talking about.
Science is based on empirical proof. You're saying it's fine to skip the proof!
sorry, but saying you believe in evolution is exactly the same as saying the world was built in 7 days unless you know what you're talking about.
since you like bagging religion, you should realise that yu're sounding extremely similar to a religious nut... i'm not defending religion at all, but at least everybody knows most of them are full of shit...
"science is the way, the truth and the light! i don't have to know how it works, it just works!!! WHAT?? SHUTTUP!!"
___________________
-Everything I Say is a Lie-
|
